You asked where you could get it not where you could get it free.
Trading using with candlesticks only and nothing else
- Thread starter ndtrader14a
- Start date
I see you have exactly the same attitude to trading education as you have with software, Radex.
This accounts for some of your many problems, and further raises the question of whether trading is actually suitable for you, given the overwhelming disparity between your stated objectives and the ways you aim to achieve them.
A big rethink over this issue would be every bit as helpful to you as a big rethink over how you trade, where you trade, with what leverage you trade, how you fund your account, and every practical aspect of what you're currently doing.
At the moment, you're stacking the deck hugely against yourself in as many different ways as possible, in an endeavour in which very few people are successful anyway. The problem is that when experienced, successful traders try to explain anything to you, you seem far more interested in defending yourself than in learning anything. That's not a good combination, and it's not one that lends itself to benefitting from trading forums, either.
I don't know that I'd say they "got it covered". They're trading candles and moving averages, not price. Trading price is independent of all that. If one can't trade price without a moving average, or candles, or even bars, then he has further studying to do.
LC
Ridiculous.
Yes indeed, and you already giving answer, only I am seeking free source,
Thankyou
Traders were tape reading long before moving averages and candles.
Life has been aquatic long before being terrestrial.
So if you can't spend your life under water,
Then you have further training to do.
Always find it interesting that candlestick analysis is so popular in the west but in Japan,where it was invented, almost nobody uses it anymore. Charts are still printed
using candlesticks in Japan, and maybe a few old timers still do candlestick analysis. Otherwise it seems to be a dead art.
using candlesticks in Japan, and maybe a few old timers still do candlestick analysis. Otherwise it seems to be a dead art.
That's perfectly true, of course, but it doesn't change the fact that your post was ridiculous.
Yes ... that's true but only another irrelevancy that's ridiculous. They say George Washington had wooden false teeth yet I'm sure he would prefer today's dentistry if he were alive. Ridiculous is the key word.