Just out of curiosity, can you summarize your approach?
In so far as I can, in a forum-post ...
I try to be careful, when answering questions like this, not to make it "sound easy", which of course it isn't, really. I've had loads of trading education and thousands of hours of screen-time, and it gets easier only
after that.
I trade "basic price action", using support and resistance, on quite fast charts. I use techniques I've learned (and gradually adapted/adjusted a little) from the books of Al Brooks, Bob Volman, Joe Ross and others. I don't really do anything difficult or complicated: I just do simple, straightforward things well and very consistently and with endless patience and discipline, after researching them methodically and systematically.
I use plenty of TA, but not indicators.
At the moment I do about 150 trades per month (that's gradually crept up from just under 100 as I've gained confidence and experience). My trades are open anywhere from 5 minutes to about 6 hours, though the average is
much closer to the 5 minute end and I very, very rarely have more than one trade open at a time. I usually scale out of positions, sometimes letting my last lots/contracts run after locking in profit.
I'm entirely mathematically/statistically/probabilistically-oriented, and not at all emotionally attached to individual results (I'm quite Aspergerish, so that's all I could do anyway: fortunately I've found a way of making a living for which some degree of Asperger's is actually advantageous).
In December 2015 I had a "big switchover" (on the repeated and insistent advice of institutional and ex-institutional trader friends who knew roughly how I trade) from trading spot forex to futures only. This was mostly so that I could trade from constant-volume bars instead of from time-based charts, and has actually made a favourably significant difference to my overall results from doing basically the same things, so I've ended up wishing I'd taken this advice when it had originally been offered, a couple of years earlier, instead of adopting my stubborn "if it's not broken, don't try to fix it" approach for so long. I'm not easy to teach, because I'm a real skepchick who questions everything and has to analyse it in detail for myself, before accepting it. From my perspective, Bob Volman and Al Brooks (and Joe Ross, in places) were the authors whose teaching reliably stood up to that, so they were the ones who influenced me the most.