I think there are 2 issues here.
1 is being able to accurately predict times when things will happen, and then anyone can have systems where one or other of their trading signals is triggered at aound that time, and they have a trade they can take.
2 is trying to predict what that signal will actually be at the stated time and then which way to trade and at what price.
1 to me gives the felxibility of a reliable so far alert time where any trading signal can happen, and all I have to do is spot it and act upon it.
2 starts to be something I would be very worried about and almost certainly would reject unless it proved to be so accurate that I couldn't possibly ignore it. The other downside of 2 is that where such information is given out and large numbers of people follow it, it is easy for a big player to 'spoil' the trade and take profits out.
I'm inclined to think that this is one of those occasions where less is more, and Sekota is wrong.
Natalie
1 is being able to accurately predict times when things will happen, and then anyone can have systems where one or other of their trading signals is triggered at aound that time, and they have a trade they can take.
2 is trying to predict what that signal will actually be at the stated time and then which way to trade and at what price.
1 to me gives the felxibility of a reliable so far alert time where any trading signal can happen, and all I have to do is spot it and act upon it.
2 starts to be something I would be very worried about and almost certainly would reject unless it proved to be so accurate that I couldn't possibly ignore it. The other downside of 2 is that where such information is given out and large numbers of people follow it, it is easy for a big player to 'spoil' the trade and take profits out.
I'm inclined to think that this is one of those occasions where less is more, and Sekota is wrong.
Natalie