Man, I haven't gone anywhere.
***
Huge shoutout to
caddyshack2006, who might trash talk but actually is a nice kid. He couldn't stand the
Pivot Trend concept, and after proving that it cannot catch market turns very well (being a linear based model), for the purposes of this thread, neither can I.
***
I was up after work doing some research until about 5am, trying to figure-out what type of
trend meter I could use in lieu of the
Pivot Trend concept, as after missing yesterday's huge upsurge, it is apparent that:
No static momentum model (at least not one that I have) is going to be able to
consistently measure market movement correctly. Nope not one. This is important, because per the rules of the thread, I need something which can be coded, is simple to use, works and will cosistently deliver the goods.
So after reading through my copy of
The Winners and Losers of the Zero-Sum Game: The Origins of Trading Profits, Price Efficiency and market Liquidity
by
Lawrence Harris
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...nners+and+losers+of+the+zero-sum+game&spell=1
and reviewing this little excerpt about who the players in the game are from
the hard rightedge website:
http://www.hardrightedge.com/wizard/ss1.htm
I decided that I will be using the
15 minute timeframe with a Simple Moving Average (40) to determine the dominant market trend, in lieu of the
Pivot Trend model for this thread. It won't be fixed and I will be able to look at trades which are against it when the market is in a narrow range, and also I will be able to stay on the right side of trends when all the screens are green and the market is making an obvious up-move,
but staying fixed to an old model is keeping me on the wrong side of it.
Once again, I don't use this stuff to trade, it's an experiment in creating a virutually autoamted public system to trade.
But it has to work to be any good to anyone.
Best Regards,
Jimmy
edit: and I knew after yesterday's huge double move up, there would most likely just be some consolidation activity today.