Fri saw the dip buyers waking up big time with the DOW swinging 900pts reversing its day start at -1% to end at +2%, the Small Cap was even more impressive going from the day's -3.2% to +1.5%. The NQ also lifter from a -12% correction closing at -8% from its high. All this on a day that, in terms of fundamentals, nothing happened!
Gamification is back in play, the individual Reddit trader with $4t of free money in hand has enough clout to break the fund manager's strategy that's working on fundamentals of the real world. These gamers turned traders move as a herd, often not knowing what they are buying but their action can none the less elevate share prices beyond any justification based on earnings or even capitalization.
The Buffett indicator has gone back above 190% of GDP and will probably get to 200% soon. Can current market levels be justified by saying that earnings will catch-up to the PE? I say... not a chance in this decade! Why? because if the real economy was as good as the markets make it out to be, there wouldn't be a need for $4t in stimulus and even with $4t in stimulus, GDP is not going to increase by 60% in a decade (remember that unemployment is currently above what it was during the great recession), however, as the saying goes... Don't fight the Fed, if markets want to be irrational then don't fight them either.
The bottom line is that, at the end of the day, markets are efficient and will sooner or later reflect fundamentals of the real economy.... when the Reddit herd and bit coin millionaires have all bought their Lamborghini and the helicopter money stops, the only conclusion is that a massive correction will happen. Perhaps the NYSE should be setting circuit-breakers based on the Buffett indicator instead of daily moves.... a 40% to 60% correction is not good for anybody, so the NYSE should have a mechanism that decreases its eventuality.
Gamification is back in play, the individual Reddit trader with $4t of free money in hand has enough clout to break the fund manager's strategy that's working on fundamentals of the real world. These gamers turned traders move as a herd, often not knowing what they are buying but their action can none the less elevate share prices beyond any justification based on earnings or even capitalization.
The Buffett indicator has gone back above 190% of GDP and will probably get to 200% soon. Can current market levels be justified by saying that earnings will catch-up to the PE? I say... not a chance in this decade! Why? because if the real economy was as good as the markets make it out to be, there wouldn't be a need for $4t in stimulus and even with $4t in stimulus, GDP is not going to increase by 60% in a decade (remember that unemployment is currently above what it was during the great recession), however, as the saying goes... Don't fight the Fed, if markets want to be irrational then don't fight them either.
The bottom line is that, at the end of the day, markets are efficient and will sooner or later reflect fundamentals of the real economy.... when the Reddit herd and bit coin millionaires have all bought their Lamborghini and the helicopter money stops, the only conclusion is that a massive correction will happen. Perhaps the NYSE should be setting circuit-breakers based on the Buffett indicator instead of daily moves.... a 40% to 60% correction is not good for anybody, so the NYSE should have a mechanism that decreases its eventuality.
Last edited:
