Trading Technologies awarded patent for DOM

"Harris developed this technology with TT and TT brought it to market to help the industry, and patented the product to protect it. Electronic trading was in existence for over 10 years (including throughout the dot-com era) before TT released MD Trader and the financial industry had nothing like MD Trader until TT brought it to market. In fact, MD Trader was radically different than the preexisting trading systems and TT needed to convince many traders that MD Trader was superior. There are still people who use the older style trading screens (such as Level II style screens) in the futures industry and other asset classes have yet to widely adopt the MD Trader style-trading tool. TT understands that many electronic futures traders who began trading sometime in the last four years may have only seen trading applications with MD Trader-like tools. These individuals do not know, because they never experienced it, what the order entry systems were like before MD Trader".

Anyone buying this?
 
On August 12, 2004, Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“TT”) filed a
lawsuit against eSpeed, Inc. (“eSpeed”) in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois in Chicago, alleging infringement of TT’s U.S. Patent
Nos. 6,766,304 and 6,772,132. The ‘304 patent issued on July 20, 2004 and the
‘132 patent issued on August 3, 2004. The patents relate to functionality of TT’s
MD Trader™, which is a component of TT’s X_Trader® trading software.
“MD Trader is an important invention that I developed along with TT. I brought it
to market with TT because I thought it would be of tremendous value to our
customers – brokers, traders and exchanges. I believe that MD Trader
represents a fundamental shift in interactive order entry and will continue to be so
for many years to come. I believe that MD Trader and other TT innovations have
added tremendous volume to the futures industry, and will eventually offer
tremendous value to all asset classes, and we intend to protect our intellectual
property,” said Harris Brumfield, TT’s CEO.
 
Quote from mmakinson:

From what I have read it seems that Harris filed for this patent when the program came out in 2000. Now that the Market Depth has become a platform standard doesn't change the fact that TT came out with it first. I

don't think that Harris really thinks that this patent will prevent everyone from every using MD, but it is a smart business move. I am an aspiring arcade trader in Chicago and I have been to several industry events, trade shows, and conferences. Everyone is gunning for TT. They all trash them, talk about how expensive they are. Everyone wants the knock down the big kid on the street. TT is just making these companies spend a little time, effort and money trying to fight this. Every little bit counts in this industry.....just my two cents

Good observation. its not just the trading arena though - but true of the software industry full stop.
 
As I've never been a pit trader I wonder if anyone could help confirm or deny a story I was told. Apparently traders used to draw their own 'Mercury bar' style displays of price and volume. I'm interested in whether this could be considered evidence that the Mercury bar, as patented recently by Trading Technolgies, isn't an original idea.

Any views?
 
I never heard of the Mercury Bar..... most traders I know including myself frequently use Alcock's Bar, River's Bar and Stocks and Blondes on Wells Street. JG
 
Mercury Bar
493 3rd Ave
New York, NY 10016

Phone: 212-683-2645


Mercury Bar
451 Ormeau Rd
Belfast
Co. Antrim
Antrim
+44 28 9064 9017
 
Trading Technologies in second patent suit

Wed Sep 29, 6:50 PM ET

By Jeremy Grant in Chicago

Trading Technologies, one of the fastest growing providers of software for global futures trading, has issued a lawsuit against Chicago-based broker Goldenberg, Hehmeyer & Co alleging patent infringement.

The move comes only weeks after the company issued a separate patent infringement suit against eSpeed, the electronic bond trading unit of Cantor Fitzgerald.

While details of the latest suit will not be made public until Thursday - court officials have yet to complete routine document scans - the action against eSpeed alleged infringement by eSpeed of two patents relating to software developed by Trading Technologies.

The suit is likely send a chill through the US futures and securities industry, already unnerved by the eSpeed action. That is because it is a sign that Trading Technologies is willing to enforce a US patent it received in August for an electronic trading system that it believes has been copied by rivals with clients across the globe.

Trading Technologies is an example of a new breed of technology providers known as Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), which provide the technology that links derivatives exchanges' electronic trading systems to thousands of traders around the world.

Many ISVs grew rapidly from their roots as start-up business and did not bother to patent the technology they had developed, some of it possibly based, even loosely, on existing ISVs' technologies.

"Most of these companies started in a garage and the last thing they were thinking about - or could afford - was patenting," said an executive at another ISV.

Many of such ISVs have grown rapidly and have customers that are the world's largest brokers and derivatives exchanges. Trading Technologies estimates that more than 50 per cent of electronic trades in the world's top four futures exchanges - Eurex, Euronext-Liffe, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Chicago Board of Trade - goes through its order entry system.

By securing a patent, Trading Technologies is now free to pursue rival ISVs that have developed trading software that it believes may now be infringing its patent.

"It could destroy the whole industry. If the patent is held up then there's not much of a limit to who TT [Trading Technologies] couldn't sue," the executive said.

The development is a reminder of fears that stalked the derivatives industry three years ago when Cantor Fitzgerald sued derivatives exchanges - including the CME and CBOT - alleging infringement of its so-called Wagner Patent.

The CBOT and CME eventually paid $15m each to Cantor Fitzgerald in out-of-court settlements.

Brokers are also vulnerable because many have developed their own proprietary trading systems. Goldenberg, Hehmeyer has its own proprietary trading system.

Trading Technologies' latest suit was filed on Tuesday at the US Federal District Court of Northern Illinois. A cover sheet seen by the FT shows Trading Technology as the plaintiff and Goldenberg, Hehmeyer & Co as defendant in a case before Judge Blanche Manning.

Neither Trading Technologies nor Goldenberg, Hehmeyer would comment.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ft/20040929/bs_ft/1c9cb6c8126711d9863e00000e2511c8
 
Back
Top