Have I misunderstood you, or is your target a third of the size of your stop-loss? (I'm not saying that makes it necessarily unprofitable, but if that's so, you're clearly going to need way more than this number of trades before you have anything realistic to "show". To put it mildly.)
Why are over 90% of the trades long and fewer than 10% short?
1
It might be because a short has infinite risk vs a long i don't know but the system is better
And should really be employed a a buy only system for the futures market on the finviz page.
They did a good job of including the most tradable contracts.
2
I mentioned the 3 to risk reward ratio in a particular context. It is probably not the best way to capitalize on the system however it is ideal for a stress test.
My deal is as follows. Money is placed in a account in escrow. I teach you the system
You are given a reasonable amount of time for testing. I am saying that with the outlined parameters -the 3 to 1 ratio with 1 being the distance between entry and the low and the markets we mentioned - the strategy will NEVER have 2 loses in a row if the strategy is being executed on all markets efficiently.
If you find an instance of 2 consecutive loses either in the future or the past. you owe me nothing if within a reasonable amount of time you are unable to do so the payment should be released