trading ranges on NQs lately

Quote from peterfigliozzi:

I agree with you 100%, it can be difficult no matter what the trader decides to do.



That would really suck! Expanding triangles? Breakout methods get killed there.

Difficult, but who said it was easy? :D

It's more than just defining "breakout". One must also look at "breakout from what?"

But I'm sure Jack is going to go into great detail on this soon, so there's no need for me to trample on his pansies at the moment.
 
Quote from Grob109:


For example, a BO can always be differentiated from a FBO because of the flags. ]


Man. What a statement. I hope you will be willing to "clarify" this for me.
 
Quote from easyrider:

Quote from Grob109:


For example, a BO can always be differentiated from a FBO because of the flags. ]


Man. What a statement. I hope you will be willing to "clarify" this for me.

The start of the thread by arzoo was very promising. But the usual put downs in response to all the prep must have killed arzoo's interest right away.

Personally I really like threads that introduce extremely important considerations. By that I mean considerations that can lead directly to a lot of money making. This was one of those threads.

For each of the described situations or opportunities there are important things that can be doine to make them very profitable. Majorly profitable.

These items and the very important one you are focussed upon BO's and FBO's and how to differentiate them ranks right up there with arzoo's super effort to enquire.

The first order of business is to get tuned into how to monitor. arzoo is doing park of the job and that has sharpened his mind to be at enquiry. Immediately, he got his toilet flushed by the usual derogatory stuff by two people missing the key item to forward arzoo's monitoring.

When anyone on the way to being a millionaire like arzoo and yourself posts, it is a major wakeup call to me to get the proactive issues on the table and to continue to be responsive to the flow of the o0pportunity.

azzoo and everyone else facing his opportunity needs to immediately upgrade the monitoring... It is the opposite of the BS that was immediately laid on arzoo. What clarifies all of these opportunities is paying great and continuing attention to the other market variable. That is volume.

DBphoenix never gets the picture anyone is facing when thwey request help. He does his usual brain farts. He and steve46 screwed up another recent thread (on using an indirect indicator of volume.) in a similar manner to how dbphoenix screwed up this thread re arzoo and then p when he began to do the same with his prediction BS.

arzoo must add volume to his monitoring. As he does he will then use pairs of data (price and volume) to improve his ability to make money.

ET is filled with people who wreck the place with literally thousands of posts that do not help anyone at all.

The theme arzoo has begun here is the general question of how to be able to differentiate among all possible situations, to be able to capitalize on the opportunities they represent.

Monitoring in an excellent manner is how to get this job done. Often one opportunity turns into another opportunity. what is important is to know what the flags are that signal these changes.

Price and volume conditions, directly, tell you most of this.

ET does not have a Q&A. ET does not have a glossary nor any classification system for types of trading. What it seems to have the most of is a bunch of B type people who pile up thousands of brain fart poats.
 
Quote from richtrader:

Please keep the pontificating out of this thread unless it has to do with the thread topic. Thanks.

What? "Pontificating" is Jack's middle name . . .
 
Quote from easyrider:

I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to actual flag patterns of some sort.

I should have used the word signal instead of flag. I understand a lot of people here use flag as a standard name for something.
 
Quote from dbphoenix:

What? "Pontificating" is Jack's middle name . . .

Is this what he was referring to??

DBphoenix never gets the picture anyone is facing when thwey request help. He does his usual brain farts. He and steve46 screwed up another recent thread (on using an indirect indicator of volume.) in a similar manner to how dbphoenix screwed up this thread re arzoo and then p when he began to do the same with his prediction BS.

Or was it this?

ET does not have a Q&A. ET does not have a glossary nor any classification system for types of trading. What it seems to have the most of is a bunch of B type people who pile up thousands of brain fart poats.

Or both?
 
Quote from Grob109:

I should have used the word signal instead of flag. I understand a lot of people here use flag as a standard name for something.

I suppose you could say that. At least, it's been a "standard name" for something for about 70 years.
 
Quote from Grob109:

Is this what he was referring to??

DBphoenix never gets the picture anyone is facing when thwey request help. He does his usual brain farts. He and steve46 screwed up another recent thread (on using an indirect indicator of volume.) in a similar manner to how dbphoenix screwed up this thread re arzoo and then p when he began to do the same with his prediction BS.

Or was it this?

ET does not have a Q&A. ET does not have a glossary nor any classification system for types of trading. What it seems to have the most of is a bunch of B type people who pile up thousands of brain fart poats.

Or both?

Still waiting for those helpful posts you keep promising to make.

BTW, congratulations for bringing the Economic Numbers thread to a grinding halt. You really ought to do something about that negativity.
 
Back
Top