Quote from nonlinear5:
I had been developing automated trading strategies, and my approach was essentially this: if certain thresholds were exceeded, the strategy would take a long position, and if the same threshold were exceeded on the other side of the spectrum, the strategy would take a short position. The same thing with the exits. That is, the underlying assumption was that the market movements (up and down) were symmetrical with respect to my conditions. In the more commonly understood terms, think of a simple MA crossover strategy. When the fast MA is above the slow MA, you buy, and when it's the opposite, you sell short. Same thing here, the assumption is that the market moves symmetrically up and down in response to these crossovers. In reality, it's well understood that the price symmetry is not there. The down moves are generally faster than the up moves. There are numerous implications deriving from this fact, and one of them is that the duration of the short trades (that is, the time while in a given trade) can be much smaller than the duration of the long trades, while you realize comparable reward/risk ratios. Thus, the entries and the exits (and even the indicators) have to be treated differently depending on whether the strategy is trading from the long or short size. Ultimately, I separated my strategies into the "short only" strategies and the "long only" strategies, and everything fell in place. They are running totally independently, using their own indicators, conditions, entries, and exits.
For me, entries are the same. It's stop movement and exits that differ.