Funny how many assumptions on ET. However, I have not disclosed my system to anyone on hereOf course they do, but they also have their reputation on the line. No need to worry, no money is exchanged hands over drinks...
Funny how many assumptions on ET. However, I have not disclosed my system to anyone on hereOf course they do, but they also have their reputation on the line. No need to worry, no money is exchanged hands over drinks...
Have you read our patent submissions and compared differences? Last time I checked I have not submitted any. BTW they cannot be the same. The point is, a person from the financial side has submitted a patent. And it all started with an algo, and mine also has a parsing schema. Although different than IEX.There is a key difference between what Brad Katsuyama is trying to accomplish and what trading is. Allthough he may started out as a trader, he is making way of new router system for orders, and that, my friend is patentable. Not his trading. Ask him...
I have the internal business method patent procedure and it's a lot more complicated than that. I agree a trade cannot be patented but a complex unique system can. As long as it meets specific criteria and rules as stated in the doco. For example internal database meta model and schema can be patented. I know all the peanuts will bring up enforcement but that's outside the scope of this thread.You can't patent trading, only some execution processes.
Even if it contains multiple AI components? I'm over simplifying with the term "trading algo" ...you can't patent a trading algo ...