Not looking to pick a fight or anything as I know you are a big fan of spreading but i've been a prop trader in London for 15 years and its the other way around here. Everyone was just spreading firstly 5/10yr bonds and STIRS, then every prop firm was an energy spread trading firm. Literally hundred of guys all doing the same flys and cals. But the correlations all broken down now (compared to how they were). You could sit a chimp down and get them making money spreading a mean reverting range back and forth for years at a time, was good whilst it lasted.
But now there are only 2 or 3 major prop firms and the guys making money are all either event traders or DOM scalpers. But hey, thats whats so good/infuriating about trading. There is no one way to make it work.
Hey, NP. I agree completely that there's no singular way to make money trading markets.
The last guys I knew at DE Trading (Glenview/Chicago) who were making money scalping at my old firm had a tool for managing {gaming} order queue position.
Looking at DRW, Jump, Peak6, Geneva, Belvidere, TransMarket today - it's all automation and still quite a bit of spreading and lead-lag correlations.
I am not aware of any firm in Chicago where manual scalping a DOM has any sort of prevalence in terms of strategy.
I've noticed this too. I wonder why it's so much more common in Europe (and elsewhere) for people to sit in-front of futures DOMs than in the US? I am guessing it is simply the amount of market-impacting events occurring around a workable European timezone (which includes being able to work US hours)?
DOM traders in US are all in stocks seems like.