OOOOh man! My head is a whirl with trying to understand what is happening. Seems like this mechanical method is some sort of STRADDLE, Delta, Gamma Scalping strategy.
Just been reading up on it. Looked up my morning straddle and it still profitable on both CALLS AND PUTS. The IV in both is higher, which is why I guess?
Trying to put the relationship between DELTA, GAMMA and IV, plus the index action in both PUTS and CALLS is making my head really spin.
I think most of the time they are talking about buying and selling stock in the explanations, but in a LONG STRADDLE you do that by buying both Calls and PUTS. Which twists up the thinking of translating the explanations a bit.
I did jot down some relationships and this coming week, will watch the GAMMA and the DELTA at the same time and probably the IV.
Gamma is the speed of the rate of change of DELTA as I understand it. The GAMMA of the index, or the PUT or CALL would be lower, when IV is higher and the GAMMA would be higher if the IV of the PUT or CALL in the long straddle. Not sure how this relates to the individual DELTA of the PUT or CALL yet.
However, when they suggest Delta neutral, they are talking of buying more Puts or CALLS as needed to balance the DELTA by adding the values together in the Long Straddle.
Going to take some more thinking about this in relationship to the Long Straddle composed of both Calls and Puts.
From the example today, IV has been rising due to a little flurry of market activity, though the Long STRADDLE went up a while and then dropped back to the beginning. This effect of IV lag on the STRADDLE means both sides of the straddle are higher premiums. I could cash them out and take a profit already. I dont understand why that happened?
Just been reading up on it. Looked up my morning straddle and it still profitable on both CALLS AND PUTS. The IV in both is higher, which is why I guess?
Trying to put the relationship between DELTA, GAMMA and IV, plus the index action in both PUTS and CALLS is making my head really spin.
I think most of the time they are talking about buying and selling stock in the explanations, but in a LONG STRADDLE you do that by buying both Calls and PUTS. Which twists up the thinking of translating the explanations a bit.
I did jot down some relationships and this coming week, will watch the GAMMA and the DELTA at the same time and probably the IV.
Gamma is the speed of the rate of change of DELTA as I understand it. The GAMMA of the index, or the PUT or CALL would be lower, when IV is higher and the GAMMA would be higher if the IV of the PUT or CALL in the long straddle. Not sure how this relates to the individual DELTA of the PUT or CALL yet.
However, when they suggest Delta neutral, they are talking of buying more Puts or CALLS as needed to balance the DELTA by adding the values together in the Long Straddle.
Going to take some more thinking about this in relationship to the Long Straddle composed of both Calls and Puts.
From the example today, IV has been rising due to a little flurry of market activity, though the Long STRADDLE went up a while and then dropped back to the beginning. This effect of IV lag on the STRADDLE means both sides of the straddle are higher premiums. I could cash them out and take a profit already. I dont understand why that happened?