Quote from Trader13:
TRO, why do you say that a trader should only follow green rat or red rat reversals, and not both? Why can't you play on both teams?
I understand your point, but I disagree with your analogy. In the case of the maze, the choice of going left or right is mutually exclusive for the same event. For the trading setups, the mutually exclusive choice would be trading the setup as a reversal or a breakout. You advise to always trade a reversal, which is analagous to always turning left in the maze. This is OK, assuming that probabilities favor this approach. But you can do the same from a daily high (resistance) or daily low (support) and not violate any lesson from the maze experiment. The relevant choice being made is to trade a reversal. Whether that reversal is from a high or low shouldn't matter. The distinction is not red rat vs green rat, it's reversal rat vs breakout rat.Quote from TheRumpledOne:
"Look, for example, at this elegant little experiment. A rat was put in a T-shaped maze with a few morsels of food placed on either the far right or left side of the enclosure. The placement of the food is randomly determined, but the dice is rigged: over the long run, the food was placed on the left side sixty per cent of the time. How did the rat respond? It quickly realized that the left side was more rewarding. As a result, it always went to the left, which resulted in a sixty percent success rate. The rat didn't strive for perfection. It didn't search for a Unified Theory of the T-shaped maze, or try to decipher the disorder. Instead, it accepted the inherent uncertainty of the reward and learned to settle for the best possible alternative.
The experiment was then repeated with Yale undergraduates. Unlike the rat, their swollen brains stubbornly searched for the elusive pattern that determined the placement of the reward. They made predictions and then tried to learn from their prediction errors. The problem was that there was nothing to predict: the randomness was real. Because the students refused to settle for a 60 percent success rate, they ended up with a 52 percent success rate. Although most of the students were convinced they were making progress towards identifying the underlying algorithm, they were actually being outsmarted by a rat."
P64 HOW WE DECIDE (italics added)
Quote from Trader13:
I understand your point, but I disagree with your analogy. In the case of the maze, the choice of going left or right is mutually exclusive for the same event. For the trading setups, the mutually exclusive choice would be trading the setup as a reversal or a breakout. You advise to always trade a reversal, which is analagous to always turning left in the maze. This is OK, assuming that probabilities favor this approach. But you can do the same from a daily high (resistance) or daily low (support) and not violate any lesson from the maze experiment. The relevant choice being made is to trade a reversal. Whether that reversal is from a high or low shouldn't matter. The distinction is not red rat vs green rat, it's reversal rat vs breakout rat.
BTW, I've looked at some of your indicators and you are an exceptional programmer.
Quote from Buy1Sell2:
Price certainly can and does move sideways in time. This is how option seller make money.![]()
Quote from TheRumpledOne:
NO. Price only MOVES up or down. Price has to CHANGE in order for it to move. If there is no change in price, there is no movement. If there is movement, then price changed.
One must be PRECISE in the use of language.