Think "eGoose", and you'll remember who I am. We've met.
Damn, this is the second time I've made this mistake. It won't happen again! How about that beer?
Regarding ENGA: They are no longer in the banner ad business. They sold that and are now exclusively a software company providing eCRM mgmt. software.
Hmmm. I did not know that. Have not followed them in a while. I just compared the two charts based on what I thought I knew ... Anyhow, thanks for correcting me. (Ya got to admit that DCLK chart looks good though)
AKAM: The double top you pointed out is valid, however, it is a "short-term" correction top. If you pull back your chart by at least 1 year, you will realize it is a double top forming after the measurement of a broader bottom pattern was satisfied. Therefore, the implied target of the small double top actually results in a test of the intermediate-long term bottom that led to the rally resulting in the 2x top.
As I said in the beginning of my post, "our time frame may be different" I look at the very short-term chart and the lower low does not look promising, but she can still go higher.
SCMR: I agree on the weak close. However, in studying the tape during the day, it was clear to me that the weak close was classic chart painting to throw end-of-day technicians off by making them think the stock closed below 50% of the day's range. In fact, the stock was rather strong and the weak close was a smoke screen to throw momentum traders off. The trick here is to observe the action over the next two days, and if the stock starts to take off, it's a clear entry. There is aggressive accumulation taking place. Look at the tape for additional clues.
Well, you got the advantage here. I did not see the action on it, so I can't know what you know.
ACRU: Light volume is an issue, but does not necessarily negate the trade as a potential set up. Berkshire trades very light as well, but it is a blue chip stock. Volume analysis must be done under a "relative" guise.
Back to different money management systems have different rules, but if you want to compare apples to apples, BRK trades $35,050,000 on average Vs $82,000 in ACRU. In other words, BRK trades 427 times the dollar amount traded in ACRU.
BTW, congrats on the new book and welcome to the board.
Tony
PS, When giving potential stock plays, it is a lot easier to analyze the potential trade if it has an entry price, stop loss, price target and time frame. I never look beyond two weeks, yet I noticed you had mentioned a price target for next quarter. Anyhow, I thought I'd point that out. I do appreciate your contribution, and I'm sure others do as well. Keep it coming. Time to go to bed.