This has turned into a ridiculous discussion.
Yes, concern for "safety" of money is critical consideration. However, in the FUTURES world, there is no guarantee. Never has been. There is no SIPC, FDIC, or any other alphabet soup guarantee or protection, other than the rules set forth by the NFA and CFTC. And those rules involve "segregated" funds. Period. That is your guarantee. You start with due diligence of the FCM. Dorman is respected, and has some warts. Name one firm, and Im not talking about the broker firm, but the clearing corporation, be it futures, or stocks, or options, or bonds, or FX, or whatever, that has no warts. Of course, MF Global and PFG were respected, and with warts too. There is no guarantee for FUTURES accounts.
So that being the case, I'll flip it... Please show a FUTURES agreement, from ANY US regulated FUTURES broker offering a safety of funds guarantee beyond segregated funds, for funds used specifically for trading futures, or for funds encumbered by a regulated futures position.
It is clear, to me anyway, some people are comparing pure FUTURES accounts to IB's universal account. This is a misleading comparison, because IB DOES NOT guarantee safety of funds held in FUTURES segregation. They offer sweeps into SIPC or FDIC protected vehicles of their universal account. That sweep can occur only AFTER an exit or flatten futures trade has been completely cleared, and can only occur on whatever timetable IB chooses, if at all.
Some seem to also be concerned about platform features. And yet again, comparing to IB. I say quit with your non-informed opinion and wish list for software you haven't used. If you want to compare features, try out the platform.
My thanks to the OP for what started out as a helpful, worthwhile to investigate topic.
Yes, concern for "safety" of money is critical consideration. However, in the FUTURES world, there is no guarantee. Never has been. There is no SIPC, FDIC, or any other alphabet soup guarantee or protection, other than the rules set forth by the NFA and CFTC. And those rules involve "segregated" funds. Period. That is your guarantee. You start with due diligence of the FCM. Dorman is respected, and has some warts. Name one firm, and Im not talking about the broker firm, but the clearing corporation, be it futures, or stocks, or options, or bonds, or FX, or whatever, that has no warts. Of course, MF Global and PFG were respected, and with warts too. There is no guarantee for FUTURES accounts.
So that being the case, I'll flip it... Please show a FUTURES agreement, from ANY US regulated FUTURES broker offering a safety of funds guarantee beyond segregated funds, for funds used specifically for trading futures, or for funds encumbered by a regulated futures position.
It is clear, to me anyway, some people are comparing pure FUTURES accounts to IB's universal account. This is a misleading comparison, because IB DOES NOT guarantee safety of funds held in FUTURES segregation. They offer sweeps into SIPC or FDIC protected vehicles of their universal account. That sweep can occur only AFTER an exit or flatten futures trade has been completely cleared, and can only occur on whatever timetable IB chooses, if at all.
Some seem to also be concerned about platform features. And yet again, comparing to IB. I say quit with your non-informed opinion and wish list for software you haven't used. If you want to compare features, try out the platform.
My thanks to the OP for what started out as a helpful, worthwhile to investigate topic.