Here are my 2 cents:I agree but I have a few remarks:
- BMW335isedan wrote:"Better trade futures instead of Forex. Forex spreads can be easily manipulated because they are not centralized. Futures have very low day trading margin so no need to trade Forex." That is an excellent posting and he is not discouraging. I traded 5 years fulltime Forex in the 90's and shifted then to futures E mini S&P. I can confirm that non currency futures are better than Forex.
- Very aggressive interventions from national banks like in forex markets are non existing in non currency futures.
- I agree that there are a lot of people (bashers) who immediatelly tell it is impossible. Most of them are losing money while trading and conclude that if they cannot, nobody can. The fact that so many give negative comments confirms that the big majority is losing money. But it is the aim to be in the minority.
1. You traded SPOT back in the '90? Things have changed quite a lot since then... Regarding the manipulation, as someone said previously they can't manipulate too much because those who do arbitrage will jump immediately and take advantage.
2. Yes you are right, the CB's will do operations on spot/money markets because is their job to do so, but it is the risk manager/trader responsibility to have a proper risk management plan and take into account such swings/scarce liquidity scenarios. For example the new regulatory framework imposed to banks by Basel Committee is taking into account liquidity when calculating market risk: FRTB(fundamental review of trading book), take a look at the adjusted ES formula.
If you are referring to SNB move @CHF, it was a no brainer that the liquidity is void below the 1.2 floor. Futures market is not too much better, let's not forget about the Flash Crash in May 6 2010.
Eitherway, this type of scenarios should be taken into consideration when doing capital allocation regardless of the traded market.
