Most aspiring (as well temporarily successful) traders fail because they believe all they require is an "edge". But hint hint, they don't call them "edges" for nothing, for they are meant to be smoothed away over time.
Trading is difficult to teach because the most effective traders know their markets inside out and take each situation as they come, one by one, while novices want easy to apply templates for rinse and repeat patterns. When I think in terms of my own trading, I can no longer understand/apply the concept of "edge" beyond pure experience and action; either I know the market and time frame I am trading, and take the proper steps to take full advantage, or I don't -- and lose. What experience gives you above all else is knowing exactly why you win or lose, as opposed to just guessing/tweaking the "odds" in retrospect.
Trading is difficult to teach because the most effective traders know their markets inside out and take each situation as they come, one by one, while novices want easy to apply templates for rinse and repeat patterns. When I think in terms of my own trading, I can no longer understand/apply the concept of "edge" beyond pure experience and action; either I know the market and time frame I am trading, and take the proper steps to take full advantage, or I don't -- and lose. What experience gives you above all else is knowing exactly why you win or lose, as opposed to just guessing/tweaking the "odds" in retrospect.
... I never sat through a full exam or completed a paper but I always scored 100% on what I attempted... The explanation to this was (as given) thats all I knew... I dare say... at one point i started believing it myself...
] etc.. I dint know how I scored until the school psychologist made me give the test three more times... different tests.. quite consistent results.. for the first time I was given credit for something.. perhaps it was the first time in all those years that they discarded the idea that I was ADHD.. I had a score in the range of 156-158..