Very good, the fallacy of the objective. I generate 400x more than anyone on these forums, any new trader can generate 1x what the best of retail can do if they follow the rules and do one simple thing, don't ask "why" following the path of least resistance. If they want 10x (semi professional) they need advanced fintech, if they want 100x (professional) they need fintech and methodology, if they want 1,000x (institutional) they need fintech and methodology with at a minimum 10,000 hours for the "why", but that is a different conversation for another day because first they have to hit parity, meaning accredited no less.
Modern day slavery is 1:100 input/output (cost of input:gains realised), due to InsightR and PRT I run at 1:400 input/output, with no human capital involved. Many on these forums will be running negative towards 100:1, a few at 1:1, that's about as good as it gets. There is one simple goal, anyone, and I mean anyone, can generate the same returns as the best here with 10x and in some cases 100x less hours going through the 1,000:1 to 1:1 normal distribution learning curve, not many make it above 1:1 which is the peak of the cycle, evidenced by the lack of trade logs being posted by anyone except myself.
You're brain is saying, I'm giving people I don't know rules and processes to strip retail traders on these and other forums of their capital, who normally have 1,000s of hours experience, using up to 100x less effort than the 10,000 hours normally required. Absolutely, because I can go to 1:10 (
InsightR), 1:100 (
PRT), 1:1,000 (
10,000+ hours) in the blink of an eye and your best at 1:1 is not on my radar so why not "spread the love". If the people here prefer to talk about flooring, crossed arms, happy days to the new "Elite Traders" taking the path of least resistance, because the "veterans" with their narrative have too much invested capital to unwind doing it any other way, Newton's Third Law.