Good time to refresh us. What is this fight about? You made a ton of money, but then lost it all because the big unregulated banks refused to execute your trades where you could have saved a bunch of losses?
Trading couple for 3 years are harassed by UBS Bahamas, your help will bring victory
- Thread starter CSEtrader
- Start date
Good time to refresh us. What is this fight about? You made a ton of money, but then lost it all because the big unregulated banks refused to execute your trades where you could have saved a bunch of losses?
Julian Assange entered the Ecuadorean embassy in London having been released on bail by a UK judge after he surrendered himself to UK police following Sweden's issue of an international arrest warrant concerning allegations of sexual assault and rape there.
Breaching UK bail is an offence in the UK and he should face trial here for this. I don't like the idea that people can break such a serious law in my country and escape the consequences, which could run to 12 month's imprisonment.
On his acquittal or release after sentence, he should then be handed to the Swedish authorities if they still wish to pursue their case. The allegations are serious and according to Sweden (a notably democratic country) credible: nobody should evade the consequences of such allegations.
How can I "refresh" if you are refusing to listen?
Fine, it is almost my first year anniversary and I can repeat one more time. Are you ready, but with open mind and willing to listen, please. Are you ready?
Our sound success, was on its maximum levels right on the last months before crisis, and it was a fruit of a good luck by novice investors. It's gone in large part with real estates investments, lose in October 2018, wrong investment in "real world" business, BNP Paribas robbery of family foundation investment. You understand?
So, we bought a nice house and moved to live in what is in our perception is paradise for growing little kids, been close to all great culture and technology ( the flight is less then traffic in NYC) . No debts, "little" money left.
After loss of October 2008, February - March 2009, we made again decent profit which was entirely eaten by robbery hidden fees applied by Credit Suisse, and long list of other factors. Of course, should we have the today knowledge we would never let banksters-brokers to play with us this way. But does our genuine attempt to start and trust in them can be indulgence for them to defraud us? Not legally, not ethicaly. And this is our case number two ( we rises it only recently, hoped too long that their promises to "working on the solution, we are not here to rob clients", were truth).
After, 3 years of intensive study - practice. Sadly we were still wrong, believing that we need a huge capital in order to make big profit (can detail that in another post).
At that time UBS' managers, one of whom we believed to be a friend , approached us with it's "excellent' new product, " created especially for the clients as you are ...."
REAL ESTATE COLLATERIZED LOAN.
They promised to us electronic platform (TT is one they are using and we were trained to use), but in the meantime they promised in email, that by the time execution s would take about 20 seconds.
Are you still with me?
The loan was activated in October, the promise came only in February, the only interests on this months would pay nor only your and our gas, but bought me cars for both.
And until August with other impediments created by the UBS malicious manager, we could not start to trade. Can put a list with chronology, it will be even longer reading.
August 2014, we made good 10% ( traded only 50% of available capital, learned risk management a and others tools of the mastery).
Are you here, Overnight? 10% gain. This has coveted all interests up to that day and the trading capital was brought at 25% of house value=50% of the loan, as from agreement.
The bombarding with emails started, menaces, executions always worth. We made our complain and received surprise answer - 1. No more electronic platform, 2. To have DMA the minimum capital is 5 mln (so why you not indicate it in your brochures? Just to induce us to sign thus disastrous lian and give our house as collateral. But this is against low). And few others, again long list, main statement, UBS admitted to be weak in executions and their whole structure
. Are you still be with me? If this is clear, let's proceed with part two.
September 2013, apogee of torture executions, we held position before FOMC ( can comment in deferent post details, mistakes), I called 1:58pm, the trade was closed 2:05 p. - I don't need to explain you that it costs us five times more. Correct?
We went to UBS right after, said that we can not continue thus way, infirmed them that will take a short vacation and will continue after. So, once the above is understood will continue with part two.
While it is against the law to interrupt the bail conditions, he already had 7 years of voluntary imprisonment. Remember that the meaning of the legal system, rooted in natural Law principles, is not to punish and obey, but to do justice, and when it needed, to re-educate and make our society live in more harmony.
The Sweden offense of alleged rape was dropped off years ago.
In your country, there are many notable, intelligent people who are not trying to defend justice. Here is one example:
" But Labour leader Corbyn said Assange should not be extradited to the US to face a charge of conspiring with former army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to break into a classified government computer.
He tweeted: “The extradition of Julian Assange to the US for exposing evidence of atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan should be opposed by the British government.”" https://pressgazette.co.uk/corbyn-c...kileaks-founders-arrest-makes-uk-front-pages/
There's no such thing as voluntary imprisonment. In this case, what you interpret as voluntary imprisonment is just evasion of justice. I hope a UK prosecution follows rapidly.
If Sweden do now wish to proceed with extradition, the US may go ahead and Britain should make no other choice but to comply.
As for Jeremy Corbyn, he is a noted Marxist communist, who lost a vote of no confidence from his own party'as MP's 3 years ago. If ever appointed Prime Minister here he would do irreparable damage to our economy, national security and diplomatic relations across the globe. The regimes he has supported include Chavez, Castro and Maduro, as well as the IRA, Hamas and Hezbollah. He simply wishes to assist Assange in evading US justice for political reasons.
how would you know .dbag!
For me it has nothing to do with justice, it is just hypocrisy.
At side of Colby's political venues, his statement in support of justice and Assange is plainly correct.
What type of conspiracy US justice is claiming against Assange, help me to understand. Conspiracy in order to deliver truth to the world ? It is normally called journalist's investigation.
The only point of this accusation US now is advancing is that Assange assisted to hide identity of Mannis - but it is normal practice for all ethical journalist, to protect identity of their informers. It is used widely in all legal structure, called the protection of witnesses. It is even implemented now by SEC USA in the whist-blower program.
US should be thankful to Assange, as Trump's supporters were, when he expose Hillary Clinton's emails
So should be with war-crimes, and those who committed it must be punished and so the whole US Army cleansed, and Assange receiving the honorable recognition.
Only one "guilt" of Assange - that he expose war crimes, thousands of cases, to the world.
To hide behind inverted justice can not help anymore.
I would not like to live in the world of Evgenij Zamyatin's "We", of Orwell "1984", filled with robots, repeating slogans. The value of every single life should always prevail, the compassion, honesty and justice must be cherished over indifference, lies, crimes.
In any way, this my thread is about our war against banks, which looks to be bigger and older then it can be assumed from the first veiw.
The above mentioned book by Alex Krainer, exposing not only roots of many lies in modern world, but giving us a real alarm of the imminent danger of a new war, which we are facing. Alex Krainer's brilliant book " The Killing of William Browder: deconstruction of great deception",
https://www.sott.net/article/369151...-Russia-Sanctions-Interview-with-Alex-Krainer
At this point obviously Assange just another victim of this war leaded campaign, and every person of good will will feel call to stay against.
And it is so simple - banksers together with their puppet's governments are conspiring in order to feed the never stopping military machine. Here on ET there are too much institutional traders and obviously, been servants of evil they must protect evil, and in doing so to help their own feeling of guilt.
I have deep believe in UK judicial system, I hope that it will be respected and serve justice, guarantee freedom of every individual, affirm superiority of law above any political-economical interests.
Last edited:
Assange has been arrested by UK police as there is a warrant outstanding for his arrest on behalf of the Swedish authorities. Their international warrant remained in force for his arrest, as soon as Ecuador withdrew his asylum status and either invited police to enter their London embassy or if Assange left the embassy.
He is accused of serious sexual charges in Sweden and I hope their justice system will pursue these to either acquittal or conviction. It doesn't seem equitable that an accused in such serious cases can simply be "forgotten" by the authorities because either they remained on the run for some time or because the accused did something that was in some people's eyes of value elsewhere in the world. He should face the case regardless of who he is or what he did elsewhere. Nobody should get automatic immunity from prosecution for crimes of violence simply because some people think they're a good human being.
As for the US charges, regardless of the content of the Wikileaks material, he is accused of assisting in espionage and assisted in the supply and publishing of classified information. These are serious charges also and he must face the consequences. Its possible he will be convicted. Its possible a trial will be found to be not in the public interest and the charges dropped. Its possible he will be found innocent. But he is not above the law, whether he carries a journalist's credentials or not.