Quote from EqtTrdr:
Just wondering the significance of the "89 tick chart"
Why do you use both Bollinger's and Channels? Seems to me the price would hit the channels thus negating the use of the Bands...
Please correct me if I am wrong.....
Thanks
-Matt-
no, there's a huge difference between the bands and the channels. Especially if you are using them for a target. The bands can move away from you as the market moves against you.
The first day I tried this I was short going into that .50 rate cut. The market was going to the moon and my lower band target was actually moving even farther down.
That's what hooked me on the possibilities here. I ended up with a 1.25 profit and flipped and took the long side at the lower band and the market kept going south and I eventually walked away profitable on that one also.
Any other method would have shaken me badly. There's a lot more to all this than is ever going to be or can be posted. It's just something to think about.
As long as you don't forget how the big money is made. The straight trend trader will make more in one day than I make all week. It's just he knows which day of the week to trade.
But to answer, the bands tell you the extreme levels, and the channels tell you the exact known past. And the trader decides which one if any is meaningful.
For example, what does it mean if prices can take out the channel but they can't trade at the extreme? It either means they are weakening or going back to get more power. What does it mean if the extreme high is below the channel? It means what used to be thought of as high is now lower.