PXG:
Wow!! This is really scary. After reading your post, I manually checked ES.D with ESZ02.D and ESH03.D.
Looks like they really flubbed the rollover on this one too. They have simply SUBSTITUTED the price of ESH03.D on 12/12 WITHOUT backadjusting. Thus, ES.D follows ESZ02.D till 12/11/02 and suddenly starts showing the price of ESH03.D from 12/12/02 onwards. The difference between the 2 contracts was only 1.00 pt hence not many people would have noticed as the error. The same applies for the switchover on 9/12/02; the difference between the rollover contracts then being just 0.25 pts.
Thus these small differences may not make a big difference to strategy results now but I shudder to think what the strategy results will be once data from 1999-2000 with their huge ranges are available on TS 7.
-kk70
Wow!! This is really scary. After reading your post, I manually checked ES.D with ESZ02.D and ESH03.D.
Looks like they really flubbed the rollover on this one too. They have simply SUBSTITUTED the price of ESH03.D on 12/12 WITHOUT backadjusting. Thus, ES.D follows ESZ02.D till 12/11/02 and suddenly starts showing the price of ESH03.D from 12/12/02 onwards. The difference between the 2 contracts was only 1.00 pt hence not many people would have noticed as the error. The same applies for the switchover on 9/12/02; the difference between the rollover contracts then being just 0.25 pts.
Thus these small differences may not make a big difference to strategy results now but I shudder to think what the strategy results will be once data from 1999-2000 with their huge ranges are available on TS 7.
-kk70