Agreed. I don't think it takes a math genius or programmer to succeed in trading. In fact it may be detrimental.Quote from jnbadger:
Some of you guys are light years ahead of the rest of us, but this thread is refreshing in confirming you don't have to be a math/programming wizard to win at this crazy game.
Quote from Bolimomo:
Agreed. I don't think it takes a math genius or programmer to succeed in trading. In fact it may be detrimental.
Read the story on the Long Term Capital Management's meltdown in 1998. They hired a team of PhDs in math, and two of whom had received Nobel prizes, to work out some program trading to achieve a 40% return year after year for 3 years. And then they lost huge in just one day. The market environments had changed and their assumptions were no longer valid.
Quote from shortie:
Dustin, do you bang out ~100 trades per day like Red_Ink?
You both maintain that what you do can't be automated. But I suspect that in reality you guys employ a set of rules many of which in fact can be automated resulting in profitable strategies. It is quite possible that the canned strats would be inferior to what you can do by eye, but they should work reasonably well nonetheless.
p.s. I like to speculate![]()
Quote from NihabaAshi:
It doesn't matter how much instinct one animal has...
There is always another animal looking down upon it as a prey and then the predator itself eventually becomes prey to another animal.
Simply, you can't just rely exclusively on instincts because eventually something else comes along with better instincts and better attack skills.
Predator --> Prey (predator) ---> Prey
With that said, as long as we aren't talking about an automatic mechanical system, most traders are not able to utilize their trading instincts which is why most traders have discipline problems...ultimately getting lost in the forest and consumed by whatever awaits them there.
Therefore, profitable traders that trade on instincts seldom have discipline problems and that in itself is an edge that most traders do not have.
Mark