No, you are. "No, you are." No, you are. "No, you are." (I could do this for hours. Who wins?)Quote from hcour:quoting trainr: ... you've missed the point."
No, you're the one missing the point.
Alternately, the statement stands. You've done nothing to refute it except say, "Un uh."They weren't "knowers", they believed they were "knowers".
Are you saying that people alive at the same time as Jesus had no idea whether or not he rose from the dead?
Sort of ludicrous, don't you think?
What if I said to you that the Twin Towers in New York were destroyed by terrorists using an atomic bomb?
One of the reasons you'd have a problem with it is you were alive at the time. You know what really happened.
If those people didn't know, don't you think they were at least mildly curious and highly motivated to find out before giving up their lives and the lives of the ones they loved?
Again, they didn't BELIEVE he did or didn't rise from the dead -- they KNEW.
And based on what they knew they were willing to die.
(Are there any thinkers on this board at all?)