You post is very equilibrated and savvy. The problem is always the same when such "companies" arrogate the right to decide about important things, like banning a member, or even worst accusing a member to be a scammer (libelling him in a public place...a PENAL crime, if accusation not prooved in court!). They wanna be investigator, lawyer and jury all in once (and you can't do it WHATEVER your website policies say, cause it's anticostitutional)... and this arises serious doubts about who controls this kind of "super-controller" with all powers in its hands.
As i suggested in an infamous thread on FF before being banned...the scammers hunt has to be passed to the authorities, if really the managment thinks there are the extremes. But of course, they don't do it cause, it could lead to a shutdown of the site, a public police investigation etc....and their business (and their sponsors' business) would not be so "happy" about this.
Regarding the bolded: yes it would be good for everybody (police too) to check that such a list for avoiding abuses by the managment too...and this is the very reason cause they will never do it.
Transparency/decent regulation is actually a DREAM for the world of forex...for the world of brokers for sure, but also all for things related like big forums (that, maybe it's a case... have brokers like main sponsors...)
cariddi74,
Yeah, that's exactly what I was implying because if there was a "transparent" public ban list so that members can see why other members were banned or membership evoked...we could then determine if management of the forum are applying their own "terms of use" policy fairly to all members.
Then again, most forums don't do such (including Elitetrader.com). Yet, I've seen other forums put a one to two word phrase under the user name to explain why the member has been banned (e.g. spamming, multiple aliases, private message harassment, scammer).
It's better than not saying anything or not responding to questions by the banned member.
Yet, these forums are privately owned (usually). The owner or management can banned, revoke membership of whomever they want...without reason or via a reason we may see as not valid. FF seems to be getting around the issue you raised involved stating publicly why someone is banned...avoiding possible litigation. In that case, I then can understand why they don't publicly reveal the reasons for their bans and why they don't respond to questions by banned members about the reason for the banning. They just don't want any legal problems.
Forums hanging around today are a lot more liberal. Yeah, still censoring but just not in a way they use to in the past that scares away members in the masses.
Heck, take a look here at Elitetrader.com about its liberal policies. For example, the thread starter gg53 is a member of this forum and a member of ForexFactory. gg53 mentioned that had he known FF whois was
"private"...he would have not joined that forum even though he seems to not be aware that FF forum has its office address listed in its about webpage statement along with pictures and Google map direction. Therefore, they are not trying to be private via some hidden agenda.
In contrast, this forum where gg53 is posting...has very
liberal policies. We have open racists that openly discuss their opinions about such, we have porn threads approved by management considering they have posted in the threads and openly stated its OK, we have political threads mainly full of personal attacks/threats/abusive language and just about everything else that most may or may not agree should be at a "trader forum". Heck, this forum even had members sharing
child porn in private message while
appearing as useful traders in the public area until one of them started posting the info in the public. Yeah, management then got rid of the person while others escape quietly back to the private area.
I'm not saying FF is better. I'm saying no forum is perfect and we really do not know what really is going on when members are being banned for what seems like not violating any "terms of use" rules in the public but maybe something is going on in the private that we don't know about...something management/owners of the forum just don't want to talk about because its just not worth discussing it because it may open them up to litigation. Just the same, there are some forums that are unfairly getting rid of some members to protect their own interests (e.g. a sponsor losing to much business because a member is freely posting similar like information)...that's their rights to protect their business model regardless if we agree with it or not.