"TI seems like it might help in those areas but I've had a few concerns:
1) they don't seem to be very forthcoming with details before joining, which just makes me suspicious.
2) I looked at the results on their site and I can't map their trade list to the live market. The times and prices don't line up."
I was more concerned about results of other traders who had bought the system. One would assume that the folks who originated the methodology would be good with it, but I was more interested in those who were their students. So, I got acquainted with them, even went on live trading hotcomm with some of them at various times. Results were as expected, some got it, some didn't. Those who did well could probably have done well with some other methodology. Those who failed likely would have failed with any system.
I would caution not to put that much emphasis in the results of one person, whether it be the instructor, or whomever. In my way of thinking, they are there to point out the trade system. It is simple enough for one to take a look at the end of the day to see how the system panned out, properly applied. It either works or it doesn't. Whether the trainer was in the trade, out of the trade, trading for real money, trading for matchsticks, or just calling the shots means little to me, as long as he called things fairly accurately and didn't miss too many.
As for TI, I don't think it is bad at all, and I understand it has changed somewhat from the original methodology. If I were to recommend something, I might suggest that you pass on TI.
I just believe that you can generate your own effective system
in about the same amount of time and save the $.