Trader28 promotional thread

I'll answer your question when you finally admit to following Jack around for the purposes of battling him (aka ALSO a type of follower).

This whole convo started because of that premise and you are yet to admit this so there is no point in moving on to what you want until you pony up on your end.

Quote from Trader666:

You continue to avoid my question. Do you personally believe Jack routinely makes 3X daily range in ES as he claims? Yes or no?
More...
 
You were totally WRONG when you posted this definitive statement. Aside from what I told you really happened, another explanation might have been that someone PMd me about it. There are others but the point is, you're a dimwit because you couldn't see any other possibilities. As a famous dead guy wrote: there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy
Quote from The Swordsman:
The irony of what you posted below is that you could not possibly have been minding your own business if you found your little old name amongst a long Hershey post, you must have been "following" just like I said you do
More...

Think you might be wrong again? Just because I point out fecal matter floating in the Hershey kool-aid, it doesn't necessarily mean that I follow him around. But because you're such a dimwit, I understand how you can think that and if it makes you happy, have at it :)

I also understand why you'd be hesitant to definitively answer my question with a yes or no. If you say you believe it (that Jack routinely makes 3X daily range in ES), you're publicly admitting you're incredibly naive. If you say you don't believe it, Jack and spydie might not let you lick their boots any more.
Quote from The Swordsman:
I'll answer your question when you finally admit to following Jack around for the purposes of battling him (aka ALSO a type of follower).

This whole convo started because of that premise and you are yet to admit this so there is no point in moving on to what you want until you pony up on your end.
More...
 
I implore anyone to quickly look up your posting history and tell me you aren't one of thee BIGGEST Jack followers in ET's history. I just dug deeper and boy, you spend all your ET time with Jack at the forefront. This isn't me talking this is your POSTING HISTORY speaking.

I'm sorry, you can try all the diversion tactics you want. How there "could have been" other possibilities. Yes, you are right, there are other pretty lame excuses for why you somehow found your name in some random Jack post but the OVERWHELMING evidence that CANNOT be overlooked is your POSTING HISTORY! Everything is about JACK!! Christ you follow him around waiting with baited breath for him to post something so you can interject.

Its been real fun Trader666, its a shame for you that your archived postings couldn't be hidden but because we all can see them, we all can see right through you. Your handle, Trader666, exists for the SOLE purpose of battling with or about Jack. Nothing more.

Have a good day flapjack


Quote from Trader666:

You were totally WRONG when you posted this definitive statement. Aside from what I told you really happened, another explanation might have been that someone PMd me about it. There are others but the point is, you're a dimwit because you couldn't see any other possibilities. As a famous dead guy wrote: there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy


Think you might be wrong again? Just because I point out fecal matter floating in the Hershey kool-aid, it doesn't necessarily mean that I follow him around. But because you're such a dimwit, I understand how you can think that and if it makes you happy, have at it :)
More...
 
You'd need to know my entire search history, the history of all posts I've ever read on ET and have access to all PMs I've ever sent or received to definitively say that. And you have seen none of those.

I never claimed I don't post a lot about Jack and his "methods" and I never claimed I don't have plenty of extended "debates" with his followers. So what? I've also said plenty of times that I feel an obligation to give newbies another point of view. Especially when Jack and his bootlickers disrupt other threads and try to entice newbies with BS.

You STILL continue to avoid my question. Do you personally believe Jack routinely makes 3X daily range in ES as he claims? Yes or no?
Quote from The Swordsman:

I implore anyone to quickly look up your posting history and tell me you aren't one of thee BIGGEST Jack followers in ET's history. I just dug deeper and boy, you spend all your ET time with Jack at the forefront. This isn't me talking this is your POSTING HISTORY speaking.
More...
 
I don't need to know any of that, your posting history speaks volumes. If you were passionate about other ET subjects, you'd have posted about them. But you don't, you only post about Jack related stuff, hence "Trader666" exists for the sole purpose of following Jack around.

As far as 3x the daily range goes, I don't even think about that stuff. Who am I to say what is and is not possible in the world of trading? Maybe he is able to maybe he is not. If you truly feel he is a liar flat out, then call him out and move on. Your problem is you called him out 800 times on ET. Get over it, put him on ignore.
You act as if making 3x the daily range is the only barometer for trading prowess. Maybe I can make 1x the daily range everyday working with components of the "Hershey method". According to you, this would be a failure since it wasn't 3X.

And please, stop with the benevolence bullshit, its a big cop out as to why you do what you do. If you want to really help newbs, start a journal and post your trades and teach people how you approach things. If you do this, bashing Hershey for not doing it would be cleary justified.



Quote from Trader666:

You'd need to know my entire search history, the history of all posts I've ever read on ET and have access to all PMs I've ever sent or received to definitively say that. And you have seen none of those.

I never claimed I don't post a lot about Jack and his "methods" and I never claimed I don't have plenty of extended "debates" with his followers. So what? I've also said plenty of times that I feel an obligation to give newbies another point of view. Especially when Jack and his bootlickers disrupt other threads and try to entice newbies with BS.

You STILL continue to avoid my question. Do you personally believe Jack routinely makes 3X daily range in ES as he claims? Yes or no?
More...
 
You need ALL of it and if you don't understand why, you're even stupider than I thought.

What's a "cop out" is your "answer" about the 3X daily range.

And speaking of bullshit, stop pretending you can read others' minds. You were "certain" you knew how I found out Jack was spreading misinformation about me too. In fact, you were totally wrong.

Go fetch spydie a kool-aid with plenty of floaters.
Quote from The Swordsman:

I don't need to know any of that, your posting history speaks volumes. If you were passionate about other ET subjects, you'd have posted about them. But you don't, you only post about Jack related stuff, hence "Trader666" exists for the sole purpose of following Jack around.

As far as 3x the daily range goes, I don't even think about that stuff. Who am I to say what is and is not possible in the world of trading? Maybe he is able to maybe he is not. If you truly feel he is a liar flat out, then call him out and move on. Your problem is you called him out 800 times on ET. Get over it, put him on ignore.
You act as if making 3x the daily range is the only barometer for trading prowess. Maybe I can make 1x the daily range everyday working with components of the "Hershey method". According to you, this would be a failure since it wasn't 3X.

And please, stop with the benevolence bullshit, its a big cop out as to why you do what you do. If you want to really help newbs, start a journal and post your trades and teach people how you approach things. If you do this, bashing Hershey for not doing it would be cleary justified.
More...
 
I don't have to pretend to read your mind, a glance at your posting history reveals a preponderance of evidence against what "you said" are the reasons why you found out Hershey was posting about you. Face it, in a court of law, you'd be fucked. Lucky for you, its no REAL crime. The only "crime" you commited was looking foolish which was only punishable by me bringing to light your posting history and love of following Jack dating back to 2004 (and possibly earlier?). The book has been thrown at you :p

Come on, have some fun Trader666. Life is too short. I promise if you take a break from Jack for a few months, you'll be a happier person. Oh and eat some more fiber too. You seem backed up. Wish you the best!!



Quote from Trader666:

You need ALL of it and if you don't understand why, you're even stupider than I thought.

What's a "cop out" is your "answer" about the 3X daily range.

And speaking of bullshit, stop pretending you can read others' minds. You were "certain" you knew how I found out Jack was spreading misinformation about me too. In fact, you were totally wrong.

Go fetch spydie a kool-aid with plenty of floaters.
More...
 
Did you get that expression from lilduckling? Because that's EXACTLY what he wrote to justify why he started his Jack Hershey memorial thread. Great minds think alike!
Quote from The Swordsman:

a preponderance of evidence
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

Did you get that expression from lilduckling? Because that's EXACTLY what he wrote to justify why he started his Jack Hershey memorial thread. Great minds think alike!
More...

:confused: :confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top