
Quote from Trader666:
Evidence? LOL!!!!! Rule #1 when dealing with Jack and his followers is to believe nothing without real proof. Posts on ET don't count.
Quote from The Swordsman:
Same goes for you short stack and your buddy freedom fighter28. Not a post about Jack shows up without one or both of you swooping in from the peanut gallery. Troll28 starts more Jack threads than anyone!
You guys may not like it, but you are followers yourselves
Happy trading.


Quote from Trader666:
In your dreams. I just provide balance to those who are able to think for themselves by pointing out the turds floating in Hershey's kool-aid punch bowl. Things like: despite all the fantastic claims, Jack returned -24% in a trading contest, backtests show Hershey's concept of the P,V relation is flawed, etc.
Quote from The Swordsman:
And if you don't feel as if you follow Jack around, a quick search of "Trader666" reveals your first 20 posts listed (several years ago) deal with Hershey and 21 of your last 25 posts reveal the same. I'm sure the rest share a similar ratio
Say what you want, but you FOLLOW Jack around waiting to pounce. Its not a big deal if thats what you like to do but at least don't deny it![]()

Quote from Trader666:
Glad you brought up the most recent group of posts... either by incompetence or dishonesty you left out the most important part... that I was minding my own business until Hershey started posting misinformation about me, which started that whole messhttp://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2014439&#post2014439
You also conveniently left out that a big chunk of my posts dealing with Hershey were back and forth debate about backtests, his ignorance about the stocks of the S&P500, etc. So using your logic I could say you're following me around now.
Why don't you go back to iterative refinement and fetch spydie a kool-aid?