Trader28 informational thread

Quote from steve46:



God Damn It, RM just caught another one of my lies!
He's got the bullshit detector of a fucking bloodhound, and no compulsive liar is safe anywhere near him.

What do I do now? Should I do something original for the first time in my life, and congratulate RM on yet another fine piece of scumbag detection work? LOL... OF COURSE NOT! I'd never break the bullshitter's code! We pathological liars are all the same, you see... So no matter how clearly our lies have been exposed, we must continue lying to the bitter end. Time for some futile ad-hominem diversion work...


That makes it official, folks- put up yet another exposed Steve911 lie on the scoreboard!

The above display is exactly how Steve911 <b>would not</b> have reacted, had he been innocent of fabricating that "163 PM's" figure. It's crystal clear: An innocent man would have jumped all over the chance to make me look bad, enthusiastically begging Baron to reveal his true PM total for the week.

911 liar guy has been Busted Again! :cool:

Now understandably, some of you are now wondering why I lower myself to the level of petty personal attacks. However, that's not what this is about at all. Simply put, 'expose the bullshitter' is just a game I like to play to hone my deception-busting skills, and if you think about it you'll see the many parallels between unraveling deception in the markets- to exposing fraud by the likes of lying scumbags like Steve911.

I don't even see Steve911 as much of an 'individual' at all, since considering his methods of deception to his ever-predictable reactions to being caught, there's really nothing to personally distinguish him from any other typical pathological liar. Steve911 is nothing more than a walking cliché, and mine is not an assault on the individual liar, but against deception itself.

So in answer to those who would ask why I 'stoop to this level', I ask in return: What would be worse- My habit of loudly calling bullshit by its name, or allowing bullshit to pass you by unhindered, en route to its next victim?
 
Quote from steve46:

Unfortunately it is often the case that the trolls (as you can plainly see) have the biggest mouths and like to put themselves right out there in front where we can all see there bullshit act in all its glory

Steve46
Yes, incredibly that's exactly what you continue to do 9/11 liar guy.

Don't make me start a poll on whom has more credibility, you or Rearden Metal. RM would trounce you in a landslide victory. He is a well respected member of this community. You, on the other hand, are known here as a liar, and a slime for lying about dead relatives from 9/11.

It's also obvious you have lied about "163" members following you on your t28 quest. There are not 163 or 16 members that wold follow you on anything here steve. You are a slime and a liar and have ZERO credibility here.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=120788
 
We have a couple of new people on board today and as can be seen, no one is replying to Trader28 or his aliases

Nice job everyone

Good luck today

Steve
 
As you can see folks, it is easy to get confirmation of any alias

Just wait for him to do the work for us :D

Again thanks everyone for your patience and discipline

Steve
 
Quote from Trader666:

Not only that but I challenge you, steve46, to a trading knowledge duel... you claim you're so knowledgeable, let's see. I propose a moderated forum, moderated by vikana who I believe has a Ph.D. in mathematics, in which we both post ONLY ideas that are easily backtested so that anyone who has Wealthlab, Metastock, Amibroker, etc. can follow along and see who knows what and maybe even learn something. We'll start by exploring the price, volume relationship and post only concepts that work and test out favorably. I understand the price, volume relationship very well, do you? Do you accept my challenge or do you concede defeat already?

I'm game: Just a few weeks ago, I offered this to Jack Hershey with the promise to keep the forum clean. All he would have to do, was to post clear rules and some of us would jointly test and validate. JHdeclined to participate.

I'm certainly open to do this in a broader context, if there is interest.

To be clear: a forum under strategy trading where only posts with systems, system tests, or specific technical comments are allowed.
 
Quote from vikana:

I'm game: Just a few weeks ago, I offered this to Jack Hershey with the promise to keep the forum clean. All he would have to do, was to post clear rules and some of us would jointly test and validate. JHdeclined to participate.

I'm certainly open to do this in a broader context, if there is interest.

To be clear: a forum under strategy trading where only posts with systems, system tests, or specific technical comments are allowed.

Its unclear what the benefit is to me....I have already done my research....it seems that you want me to disclose to you ideas that took me quite some time to learn on my own.

I am open to hearing Vikana's thoughts on this...What seems to be proposed is that I "give up" my own research to prove something to you...

Vikana, what are your thoughts.
 
Comming up on the end of day folks and I notice that none of us replied to Trader28

He posted to my thread "Ideas for Struggling Traders" as

Pocket Aces

I did not reply

So far the benefit has been that Trader28 no longer seems to post repeated insults in the Hershey threads...In fact his posts are now confined to Feedback and to trying to get one of us to reply to him

Swordsman offered an idea that we may implement in the next day or so. Going foward I ask that you all continue as you have been. No replies to Trader28

Thanks again and good luck to all

Steve
 
Back
Top