Quote from software1:
Based on your own post admitting that you took notice of AVR in the afternoon as opposed to your claim of having traded it in the morning, it's not only fair but only logical from a professional point of view to challenge your post and come to the conclusion that you CAN NOT be the author of those executed trades. I haven't challenged you on your previous posts, simply because i didn't find any discrepancies. In this one however, i did.
Also, pm'ing me and calling me a jackass and labeling me as a hater doesn't raise the argument not only to a professional level let alone to an intellectual one.
That's all i have to say on the subject. All you forumers make your own assessment and draw your own conclusions
welcome to the boards,
this thread was started by some honest traders that have gained real respect from us other traders because we're seeing one of the few rules that I too am aware of, talk about everything other than actual money, being broken
but broken to the upside.
too often frauds, including most of these propritary trading operations (that require significant monetary and time investment in getting licensed and paying rediculous fees, like $500 Chicago Stock Exch annual fees and $4 paper check fees) cheat honest traders by not really teaching them anything other than how to rack up commissions....
you also mentioned that this thread seemed like those posted by runners of fraud, scam, boiler rooms..... those guys NEVER EVER show facts, details or true losses let alone gains, just bull@#$@# stories....
clearly you have a problem with some of the posters on this thread.
out of respect to the rest of us, could you kindly.....
ok?
thanks!
