instead of paying per share, like .004 p/s at e*trade pro, they just pay per fill.. like say $1, regardless of how many shares. guys at HLV could put in an order for say 15,000 LU, and only pay ~$1. if the transaction for some reason took 3 prints to fill (8,000 shares, 5,000 shares, and 2,000 shares) they'd pay $1 per print for a total of $3. if it was a limit order, ARCA would still rebate them .002 per share, or $30.Quote from AceRothstein:
Could you explain what you mean by paying per print?
Quote from SammySOESa:
instead of paying per share, like .004 p/s at e*trade pro, they just pay per fill.. like say $1, regardless of how many shares. guys at HLV could put in an order for say 15,000 LU, and only pay ~$1. if the transaction for some reason took 3 prints to fill (8,000 shares, 5,000 shares, and 2,000 shares) they'd pay $1 per print for a total of $3. if it was a limit order, ARCA would still rebate them .002 per share, or $30.
if they were paying .004 p/s for the 15K shares, they'd pay $60. it's the best commission structure for all the volume monsters out there.
Quote from AceRothstein:
Leaving the argument about the merits of rebate trading as a system aside, it would seem beneficial for one to learn it even for no other reason than qualifying for these razor thin rates. That would help the bottome line of whatever your main method of trading is without question.
oh i didn't even know that. so it's just amex and naz that gives the rebates?Quote from joeyata1:
who gives an ecn rebate on lu? its a nyse stock and there's no rebate. hell you can get $2 and $3 per trade unlimited shares anywere. freetrade was a $1 unlimited. whats forgotten here is what happens if that 25 or 50k goges against you 3 or 4 cent. it looks good if it works