Hitman wrote:
****************************************************
"There are two reasons we let go of people:
1) Guys who take 1 point or more hits in stocks frequently. The guy who was let go lost more than $500 a day trading 200 shares on almost a weekly basis. Even today, he traded 400 shares each way total, lost $440 in a single 200 share position. This is despite of me telling him avoid news stories each day, yet he continues to trade the biggest movers every single day and continued to lose big while trading very small shares. If you don't learn to cut your losses, you will be cut, as simple as that. "
and
"It is inevitable that you need to do some clean up every now and then, especially in this market environment. The guy had serious problems with cutting his losses and the amount of money he lost trading 100 and 200 shares was just insane. It was the right decision. You CAN NOT teach discipline."
****************************************************
These comments by Hitman led me to wonder what measures prop firms take when a pattern of irresponsible trading appears. (In the above case, losing $440 on 200 shares, a $2.20 loss, suggests this person is unaware of or has scant regard for time honored risk/reward prinicples.)
If traders are left to continue on their merry way while trading in such a manner then naturally it should come as no surprise to anyone (except perhaps the traders themselves) that they are cut. Does the firm make some attempt to address such trading patterns or is the onus solely on the trader to improve his performance?
(This question would apply more to firms like Worldco, in cases where the trader is risking the firm's money, but I would be interested to hear other "customer" funded firms' thoughts also.)
Hitman, as far as your comment that discipline cannot be taught goes, can anything REALLY be "taught"? I prefer to think that the other person LEARNT something, rather than I TAUGHT them. I think the best a manager/educator/mentor etc can do is impart their knowledge, offer support, assistance and encouragement, but that ultimately, the "learning" can only take place by the individual himself.
The other point I wanted to make is that holding the belief that discipline cannot be taught (something, based on my comments above, I agree with, although the armed forces may disagree!) may itself hold you back from even attempting to creatively find ways to help a trader whose main problem appears to be a lack of discipline.
PS
As a new poster I might add that I've been following these boards for the past few weeks and find there is a lot of valuable information being shared. I especially enjoy reading Hitman's journals, as he often discusses issues that all of us, as traders, have at one time experienced. Whilst his style attracts scorn (yeah he often comes off as a 'blow hard' - many people display a bolder persona on message boards than they might otherwise exhibit) such candid commentary always deserves kudos.
Daniel
****************************************************
"There are two reasons we let go of people:
1) Guys who take 1 point or more hits in stocks frequently. The guy who was let go lost more than $500 a day trading 200 shares on almost a weekly basis. Even today, he traded 400 shares each way total, lost $440 in a single 200 share position. This is despite of me telling him avoid news stories each day, yet he continues to trade the biggest movers every single day and continued to lose big while trading very small shares. If you don't learn to cut your losses, you will be cut, as simple as that. "
and
"It is inevitable that you need to do some clean up every now and then, especially in this market environment. The guy had serious problems with cutting his losses and the amount of money he lost trading 100 and 200 shares was just insane. It was the right decision. You CAN NOT teach discipline."
****************************************************
These comments by Hitman led me to wonder what measures prop firms take when a pattern of irresponsible trading appears. (In the above case, losing $440 on 200 shares, a $2.20 loss, suggests this person is unaware of or has scant regard for time honored risk/reward prinicples.)
If traders are left to continue on their merry way while trading in such a manner then naturally it should come as no surprise to anyone (except perhaps the traders themselves) that they are cut. Does the firm make some attempt to address such trading patterns or is the onus solely on the trader to improve his performance?
(This question would apply more to firms like Worldco, in cases where the trader is risking the firm's money, but I would be interested to hear other "customer" funded firms' thoughts also.)
Hitman, as far as your comment that discipline cannot be taught goes, can anything REALLY be "taught"? I prefer to think that the other person LEARNT something, rather than I TAUGHT them. I think the best a manager/educator/mentor etc can do is impart their knowledge, offer support, assistance and encouragement, but that ultimately, the "learning" can only take place by the individual himself.
The other point I wanted to make is that holding the belief that discipline cannot be taught (something, based on my comments above, I agree with, although the armed forces may disagree!) may itself hold you back from even attempting to creatively find ways to help a trader whose main problem appears to be a lack of discipline.
PS
As a new poster I might add that I've been following these boards for the past few weeks and find there is a lot of valuable information being shared. I especially enjoy reading Hitman's journals, as he often discusses issues that all of us, as traders, have at one time experienced. Whilst his style attracts scorn (yeah he often comes off as a 'blow hard' - many people display a bolder persona on message boards than they might otherwise exhibit) such candid commentary always deserves kudos.
Daniel
