Trader Girl Forex Trades

[amytrade]

Quote from cabletrader:

Of course you do, we all believe you, you are a VERY big trader, huge, a veritable whale, and a real stand up guy to boot

Hey it's not April 1st for a couple of weeks yet!

That's hillarious cabletrader. I just knew both of these guys when challenged would prove me right, they know nothing about trading and are the real ones trading micro lots! They are probably one and the same. Like you said he's Mr Alias man!

 

[TraderZones]

Quote from amytrade:

You CLEARLY are NOT too bright yourself.

Because I keep repeating that you are totally unwilling to back up your claims? I expanded it greatly, showing numerous ways - audit sites - where you can demonstrate you make "a ton of money." The fact you keep avoiding this demonstrates you are a paper trader wannabe.

A true dumb A$$ in my opinion.

Your opinion is that of a flyweight... But since you live in upside world, then I guess that was your attempt to give a compliment.

Fibs don't work.

FINALLY you get it. That was already proven. I am glad you finally understand

High and low today both with fibs.

Yes, you obviously fibbed high and low about claiming to make "a ton of money."

You give dumb people a bad name sir.

Yes, I was addressing you, ma'am. Now, are you going to keep avoiding the proof of your claim that you made a "ton of money." Verifiable account statements or one of the auditing sites.

And you can also provide your Profit Factor, Sharpe, Sortino, and other ratios. You see Miss Amy Tater Tot, "a ton of money" is irrelevant without STATISTICS. People game their equity curve. On paper, they can claim anything. It is NOT about making MONEY. It is called RISK-ADJUSTED RETURNS. But I suppose a paper trader does not fathom this either.

Throwing up a bunch of Voodoo levels (to use your terms) is irrelevant. Were they "approached"? Touched? Penetrated? By how much? If you say Fib levels of 23.6%, 38.2%, 50%, 61.8%, and you claim your level was reached - did your 38.2% actually reach 43%? How much wiggle room did you allow? What margin cuts off your "level"?

In other words, everything you claim has absolutely ZERO value and ZERO use without solid auditing or account statements.

Everything you have said up to this point, is simple paper trading 101. And since you refuse to prove your "ton of money" then I feel absolutely no insult when you try to be clever.

You are a rank amateur of the first order. Anyone who supports you, based on your claims, is someone I consider a trading lightweight. Because a serious trader would say absolutely the same things I say. This is precisely what some of the experienced ET traders say on other threads when people like you make ridiculous claims::

Where are your account statements? Paper claims mean nothing.

Where are your audited results? What are your stats (Sortino, Profit Factor, et al?

Why do you ignore serious studies that show that your claims do not work? Why are you using a few examples to try and prove to the opposite? did you take Statistics for Tater Tots????

What was your money management? Hold&Hope? Hold&Pray? Do you let a position get against you (MAE) by $2000 to lock in a $50 profit?

WHAT IS YOUR RISK OF RUIN, TRADER GIRL??????

 

[cabletrader]

Quote from amytrade:

That's hillarious cabletrader. I just knew both of these guys when challenged would prove me right, they know nothing about trading and are the real ones trading micro lots! They are probably one and the same. Like you said he's Mr Alias man!

Ah they're only kids having a bit of fun you can't hold it against them, neither of them could trade their way out of a wet paper bag, that much is evident otherwise they would have been only too eager to post their analysis and prove themselves. But hey, this is the internet where everyone's fantasies can become a virtual reality!

Before the two goons popped up this was actually quite an interesting thread, I've learned a couple of things here so thanks! Those two are so busy up their own butts they missed the value of the thread, their loss.

 

[TraderZones]

Quote from IluvVol:

Man, I am out of here, really nothing of value. Guys, dont believe me now just check it out down the road: She is gonna sell you something....you will see....nobody wastes their time to put up some numbers for nothing.....her website link will pop up later...;-)

Did any of you notice how every chart of hers has a different time frame and the highs and lows she picks for her fib levels vary by a huge degree. Very insightful and consistant, thanks for showing how to fit to past data.

You seem to be the only other one who gets it. Sorry to see you go.

 

[cabletrader]

Quote from TraderZones:

You seem to be the only other one who gets it. Sorry to see you go.

And cue some mutual ego stroking...."you're the best TraderZones"...."You're a whale IluvVol", jeez I'm gonna puke it's so predictable!

 

[Martinghoul]

Quote from TraderZones:

Try backing up a couple of pages

Nice article, seems like sound research... Liked it and this gives me even more reason to believe that Fibonacci retracements are a form of witchcraft.

However, and this, TZ, is key, even the authors exhibit healthy skepticism about their own methodology, saying that the set of different input parameters they used is NOT exhaustive.
For example: "It is of course possible that our results are an artefact of the parameters of our testing procedure"

This is precisely what I am suggesting to you. Research is just that, research. It gets refuted, revised and there's no guarantee in there that it's correct.

Anyways, the point is that you with your blind belief in the wrongness of something sound a LOT sillier than Amy, who is at least willing to consider the possibility that her success (whether real or imaginary, I don't care) is due to something altogether different than the mythical Fib levels. She sounds a lot more sensible than you, I must conclude.

 

[vialato]

I've been following this thread since the begining and it was very interesting.

But it is turning rubbish now. It seems that we are on a school gardening.

- "Let's challenge ourselves"
- "You first"
- "No do it first"
- "No, will not do it until you begin"

Some people should leave, especially those who brought the least.

In fact, who brought absolutely nothing except a "Fib does not work viewpoint"

I guess virtual social relationhips are particular but no need to turn nasty for such a tiny detail.

 

[fearless9]

Quote from amytrade:

You won't EVER see a website link by me. I wouldn't help you and that other idiot make money for any amount of money.

You should have kept your dumb mouths shut and over time I might have revealed how I do it. Now you're screwed. LOL

Just ignore the clowns AT and dont ever worry about showing them how to make money.

It takes more than methodology to make money as those who make it know.

regards
f9

 

[Martinghoul]

Quote from fearless9:

Just ignore the clowns AT and dont ever worry about showing them how to make money.

It takes more than methodology to make money as those who make it know.

regards
f9

Amen to this profoundly true statement...

 

[TraderZones]

Quote from Martinghoul:

However, and this, TZ, is key, even the authors exhibit healthy skepticism about their own methodology, saying that the set of different input parameters they used is NOT exhaustive.
For example: "It is of course possible that our results are an artefact of the parameters of our testing procedure"

Sound research considers all constraints, limitations and other similars. It in no way means they doubt their own work. It is not a sign that "It gets refuted, revised and there's no guarantee in there that it's correct." They pretty much established that Fib and round numbers are useless.

Anyways, the point is that you with your blind belief in the wrongness of something sound a LOT sillier than Amy...She sounds a lot more sensible than you, I must conclude.

Compared to Amy Trade, who thought she refuted a sound study with several "examples" of her own? This has not been the first nor last sound study to implode the amateur trading world, which blindly follows things like EW, Gann, Fib and other useless trash through belief, and not proof.

Amy said "she makes a ton of money" I requested over 5 times for proof of such a stupid claim, and she dodged every request. Then I offered about 7 sites where she can get audited. Again, she dodges.

Did you see her jumping right onto the idea of getting her "ton of money" audited? Of course not.

Did you see her address my point that claiming you make money is meangingless without system stats like Sharpe, Sortino or profit Factor? And that it is RISK-ADJUSTED $$$ that matters? Of course not.

95% of traders are believed to lose their money, and Amy is their poster child. Amy is no more profitable than a Howler monkey with real dollars.

Belief, claims and opinion in the trading arena are marks of newbies, losing and paper traders. I call her out on something because it was obvious she has no idea of what she is doing.

If someone sees me as more silly than Amy, by my using strong evidence against opinion and claims, then I have little respect for and I am unmoved by their opinion.