I always like reading your posts cause we seldom agree, LOL. I can't stand entering on momentum but I do on some entries, momentum entries always cause the greatest risk and smaller profits. It use to be taught in the 1980s you needed deep enough retracement and much lower than recent pivot high cause that is going to be area where price most likely going to challenge first, so you give up couple ticks to get in and you want sizeable amount of points till this pivot high to take some profit, protective stop should be recent lows minus couple ticks. But if you have a shallow lower high, you buying right near recent highs and becomes more of a coin flip of theory whether continuation of trend or reversal, plus the risk is still beyond recent lows. Some markets like ES, financials chop more, but markets like Crude oil and Russell more likely to behave better in shallow retracement. I really prefer to just buy on retracements on a limit, if I get in, I get in, always another trade, but risk is shorter and my plan is often near recent highs of getting out.
As far as different kinds of entries, there are so many. I like ones where you have a two tick breakout but platform then will buy 2 ticks better, and get filled often on most markets cept for coffee/cotton lightly traded then use stop and limits to get in, not going to chase much. Say you take trend off five minute charts, use Bollinger Bands on 2 minute chart and get in on/near lower band, but I like having 18ema on five minute chart and price hitting 18ema which on 2 minute price hitting BB so retracement is deep enough.
Money management to me has safeguards of preserving capital till better opportunity fits my trading plan. Don't see it as costing me money, that is like breakeven plus one tick profit, where one tick is better than breakeven minus fees. Other day had eighteen plus one tick trades in a row then next three trades made $100 per each, you just never know.