TopstepTrader and Patak Trading Partners- Any and all questions answered here

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from marketsurfer:

:eek: :confused:


The Pekelo bizarre line of non nonsensical questions continue. Hopefully, the mods here will have the wisdom to delete the nonsense, and others to ignore it. Otherwise, its not going to stop.. surf

Ditto

The guy delivers pizzas, plays a ukelele in hotel bars and is a documented failed paper trader.
 
Michael,

I got my proposal approved yesterday afternoon, payed my 350.00 and got a message saying that I would get a follow up email with further details by 5pm CST last night.

It is 9:45am EST and I have nothing. No email, no follow up from your team from the mail I sent this morning(@8:26EST) inquiring about my combine status. I also tried calling you guys in CHI @ around 8:15EST and 9:55EST but got all voicemails.

Today was supposed to be Day 1 for me. Please have someone get back to me and either tell me where I can find the information I need on the site for download, user id and pass word. Or send it to me.


"WorstTraderEVER"
 
Quote from SWScapital:

Michael,

I got my proposal approved yesterday afternoon, payed my 350.00 and got a message saying that I would get a follow up email with further details by 5pm CST last night.

It is 9:45am EST and I have nothing. No email, no follow up from your team from the mail I sent this morning(@8:26EST) inquiring about my combine status. I also tried calling you guys in CHI @ around 8:15EST and 9:55EST but got all voicemails.

Today was supposed to be Day 1 for me. Please have someone get back to me and either tell me where I can find the information I need on the site for download, user id and pass word. Or send it to me.


"WorstTraderEVER"

Elena resolved my issue.
 
Question for Patak or TST_Hoag:

Would TST allow for a custom combine whereby the trader can trade MORE than the 10 days within the 10 day combine (which gives 30 calendar days, and thus more actual trading days than 10), same for the 20 day combine (60 calendar days), while still meeting the performance criteria?

This question is a result of a discussion from the other thread:


QUOTE]Quote from Maverick74:

Michael, I've got a suggestion for you and I'm curious what your thoughts are on this. I started a thread awhile back brainstorming how I would create a combine that would make sense for both the trader and the backer. I didn't really come to any solid conclusions on how best to do that that would be different from your model.

But now I thought of something.

I think the idea of a time period is counterproductive. Here is something I think makes more sense. You create a combine that has a p&l target. Let's say on a 50k account you set it at 15k. The catch is, there is no time limit in which to hit. A trader simply trades every day or when he wants and builds toward that 15k. It could take him a week, it could take him a year. Now, during this whole process he still has to hit the performance metrics. You still stop them out if they lose 1k in a day. And each week they get graded on whether or not they hit the metrics. What you would do is charge them per week for staying in the combine. They can quit anytime they want, but if they want to stay in and work towards that 15k goal, they would have to re-new their credit so to speak each week. They still would be eligible for the refund by hitting their metrics. So let's say you charged $50 a week. If they are net profitable for the week and don't get stopped out and met 2 of 3 criteria, they would not have to pay for the next week. If the following week they didn't meet it, they could choose to pay $50 to stay in or quit.

Now, let's say someone was down a lot of money and wanted to reset their account. You could offer them the option to pay for the right to re-set their p&l back to zero, say $150. The idea here is that this would take away the incentive of having guys game the combine. Also, it would remove the pressure of having to come from behind in the 4th qtr with 2 minutes left and no timeouts.

I think this would work well for you, as you can get a continual stream of fees every week. And for the trader, they can take their time and work towards that goal. By the time they hit 15k they will have put in a lot of time and built a lot of discipline along the way. You know they didn't get lucky and you get a chance to see them over a longer period.

I think the trader would like this as well, because they can focus on the big picture and not try to game their p&l. I also think traders will build better habits by focusing on hitting their performance metrics each week vs hitting their p&l mark.

I think it's a win win for both parties.
[/QUOTE]


Quote from ScalperJoe:

Yes, but I've also stated on the other thread that a trader WILL at least make the attempt to pass.

You can build all the good habits and consistency with the practice account. Once you sign up for the combine, you're going to try and meet the P&L objective. The CL traders who got funding prove that point.

Having a time period at least sets a deadline to accomplish a goal. Maybe one tweak to the combine is to allow traders the option to trade any amount of days within the period.

In other words, instead of restricting it to only 10 days out of 30 calendar days, trade any amount of days within the period, with a minimum of 10 days. For the 20 day combine, trade any amount of days to meet the objective within 60 calendar days, with a minimum of 20 trading days.

This lowers the net average required per day to meet the P&L objective, and allows the trader more days to work their way out of a draw.
 
Quote from optionbull:

This question is for Michael P. or any TST representative

Does TST EVER take the other side of traders positions when funded ?

Too absurd to answer.
 
Quote from SWScapital:

Michael,

I got my proposal approved yesterday afternoon, payed my 350.00 and got a message saying that I would get a follow up email with further details by 5pm CST last night.

It is 9:45am EST and I have nothing. No email, no follow up from your team from the mail I sent this morning(@8:26EST) inquiring about my combine status. I also tried calling you guys in CHI @ around 8:15EST and 9:55EST but got all voicemails.

Today was supposed to be Day 1 for me. Please have someone get back to me and either tell me where I can find the information I need on the site for download, user id and pass word. Or send it to me.


"WorstTraderEVER"

I checked with our support and they confirmed you are all set up and good to go. Let me know if you have any issues, if so Ill have a member of my team give you a call.

Trade smart and always trade for tomorrow.

Mp
 
Quote from ScalperJoe:

Question for Patak or TST_Hoag:

Would TST allow for a custom combine whereby the trader can trade MORE than the 10 days within the 10 day combine (which gives 30 calendar days, and thus more actual trading days than 10), same for the 20 day combine (60 calendar days), while still meeting the performance criteria?

This question is a result of a discussion from the other thread:


QUOTE]Quote from Maverick74:

Michael, I've got a suggestion for you and I'm curious what your thoughts are on this. I started a thread awhile back brainstorming how I would create a combine that would make sense for both the trader and the backer. I didn't really come to any solid conclusions on how best to do that that would be different from your model.

But now I thought of something.

I think the idea of a time period is counterproductive. Here is something I think makes more sense. You create a combine that has a p&l target. Let's say on a 50k account you set it at 15k. The catch is, there is no time limit in which to hit. A trader simply trades every day or when he wants and builds toward that 15k. It could take him a week, it could take him a year. Now, during this whole process he still has to hit the performance metrics. You still stop them out if they lose 1k in a day. And each week they get graded on whether or not they hit the metrics. What you would do is charge them per week for staying in the combine. They can quit anytime they want, but if they want to stay in and work towards that 15k goal, they would have to re-new their credit so to speak each week. They still would be eligible for the refund by hitting their metrics. So let's say you charged $50 a week. If they are net profitable for the week and don't get stopped out and met 2 of 3 criteria, they would not have to pay for the next week. If the following week they didn't meet it, they could choose to pay $50 to stay in or quit.

Now, let's say someone was down a lot of money and wanted to reset their account. You could offer them the option to pay for the right to re-set their p&l back to zero, say $150. The idea here is that this would take away the incentive of having guys game the combine. Also, it would remove the pressure of having to come from behind in the 4th qtr with 2 minutes left and no timeouts.

I think this would work well for you, as you can get a continual stream of fees every week. And for the trader, they can take their time and work towards that goal. By the time they hit 15k they will have put in a lot of time and built a lot of discipline along the way. You know they didn't get lucky and you get a chance to see them over a longer period.

I think the trader would like this as well, because they can focus on the big picture and not try to game their p&l. I also think traders will build better habits by focusing on hitting their performance metrics each week vs hitting their p&l mark.

I think it's a win win for both parties.
[/QUOTE]

Scalperjoe and maverick- this is something we have discussed in scout meetings. Both points are solid and would be better in the development of certain types of traders. I will look into seeing if this is something we could start approving for our CUSTOMIZED objective.

For the elite traders out there would you like to see this type of review added to the Combine?

Thanks,

mp
 
If a trader maintains consistent performance with low to zero drawdown on a 150K Combine, but falls short of his profit target by say $3000 and ends up with $10 000 in profits, would you still consider funding him?

Or would it be better if that trader applied for a customized Combine with a $10 000 profit target in advance? Is that something you would even entertain?

I know that I personally would prefer to fund a consistent winner with low drawdown and a smooth equity curve, compared to a trader with wild P&L swings, even if he made slightly more money in the end.

I think the Combine is realistic and achievable, but perhaps the profit targets are set slightly high on average and may cause traders to trade their P&Ls and not the market?
 
Quote from Laissez Faire:

If a trader maintains consistent performance with low to zero drawdown on a 150K Combine, but falls short of his profit target by say $3000 and ends up with $10 000 in profits, would you still consider funding him?

Or would it be better if that trader applied for a customized Combine with a $10 000 profit target in advance? Is that something you would even entertain?

I know that I personally would prefer to fund a consistent winner with low drawdown and a smooth equity curve, compared to a trader with wild P&L swings, even if he made slightly more money in the end.

I think the Combine is realistic and achievable, but perhaps the profit targets are set slightly high on average and may cause traders to trade their P&Ls and not the market?

Laissez- the profit target is a line in the sand. We do not review those that are less than the amount that is standard for the Combine they are in or what they were approved for when they sent a Customized Objective.

You may customize your objective as to avoid trading only for profit. If you do request a lower profit target we will most likely reply with a max drawdown and other metrics so we may see that you have proper trading mechanics and downside control but ultimately a trader needs to produce profits as well.

http://www.topsteptrader.com/customevaluation

mp
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top