everything that just happened is informativeand is'nt broken support informative?
everything that just happened is informativeand is'nt broken support informative?
no kidding. I hear of some who make money on what has happened. And others who make money on what is going to happen. That leaves a lot in the middle for those of us that can only make money from what is happening.As is - what is happening
RN
no kidding. I hear of some who make money on what has happened. And others who make money on what is going to happen. That leaves a lot in the middle for those of us that can only make money from what is happening.
The numbers mean nothing without knowing what they're based on. How many trades are you talking about here? An exact number please,, not some round-off. I would also like to see something more precise than "70%+". Looking forward to your update.Hi ET Gurus,
My first post here. I have been working on a building a system / strategy for some time. Its essentially combining Elder's impulse system with Support/Resistance. The system gives me an Entry, Target and a Stop loss and Exits the trade if Target or stop loss hits or if the entry criterion is voided. In a backtest for over 2 years I am getting 70%+ profitable trades with Avg Win/ Avg Loss of 2.5:1. Most of the trades last for few days and some for about a month.
Before I dive in with this system, I wanted to check with ET gurus here if these numbers are are too good to be true and I may have made error in the back test. Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ucicelos
and that's what makes a market, You like the middle someone else likes the edges, as long as we all agree on who the mark isThis I like ^
================
Rest of of it - I disagree with most of it
RN
What? Did I say something wrong?
The numbers mean nothing without knowing what they're based on. How many trades are you talking about here? An exact number please,, not some round-off. I would also like to see something more precise than "70%+". Looking forward to your update.
if it is consistent then it is no longer tradingI can reasonably assume you posted what you believe
In no particular order:
With respect to trading..., I do not concern myself with right / wrong - only conducive / non-conducive
I am no where near qualified to tell another human their beliefs are wrong - would be way overly egotistical on my part - not to mention..., no way I can know another's internal to that extent
Again - I can only address conducive / non-conducive
=======================
Some of your previous comments are non-conducive to consistent / successful trading.., nor do they reflect the reality
I'm referring specifically to day trading
RN
if it is consistent then it is no longer trading