It was pointed out by the republicans here at ET, before the Edwards story was known to be true...that the the National Enquirer is a very accurate source for this kind of story.
So why are you not now defending the story in the National Enquirer about Palin since your ilk was defending the National Enquirer before the Edwards story was known to be true?
So why are you not now defending the story in the National Enquirer about Palin since your ilk was defending the National Enquirer before the Edwards story was known to be true?
Quote from Mercor:
That was a true story.