to the atheists on the board

[Turok]

>"Enjoy your fantasies."

>Irrelevant, opinion, assumes fact not in evidence.

That's ok ART, you just these evening demonstrated *on the record* that for yourself there need not be *any* facts presented into evidence before determining the outcome of the case.

Just a bit of your own medicine.

JB

 

[ARogueTrader]

More claims and conclusions without supporting evidence relating to "the case."

Regarding your medicine comments, you continue to attempt to personalize this discussion.

Irrelevant and ad hominem.

Quote from Turok:

>"Enjoy your fantasies."

>Irrelevant, opinion, assumes fact not in evidence.

That's ok ART, you just these evening demonstrated *on the record* that for yourself there need not be *any* facts presented into evidence before determining the outcome of the case.

Just a bit of your own medicine.

JB

 

[dbphoenix]

What's frightening, Turok, is that there are so many people just like him. :eek:

 

[LongShot]

Quote from dbphoenix:

What's frightening, Turok, is that there are so many people just like him. :eek:

I NEVER THOT WE'D AGREE ON ANYTHING BUT HERE WE ARE BROTHERS IN ARMS.. WILL WONDERS NEVER CEASE. HI BROTHER ! HOW'S TRICKS..

 

[Turok]

>What's frightening, Turok, is that there are so
>many people just like him.

Exactly DB. When one slowly and methodically uses their statements to show the flaws in their conclusions they withdraw into the only defense they can muster....blubbering denial.

ART's "facts not in evidence" plea after *writing* the facts into the record that very evening is the laughable equivalent of Bart's "I didn't do it, no one saw me, you can't prove a thing".

It's still rather enjoyable to reduce them to that state though.

JB

 

[LongShot]

Turok, I've thoroughly enjoyed watching you methodically tear ART limb from limb..

 

[Turok]

Ahh shucks LS. 'Twas nothin'. I was watching the progress bar on my computer crunching backtesting numbers and had little else to do.

JB

 

[LongShot]

Quote from Turok:

Ahh shucks LS. 'Twas nothin'. I was watching the progress bar on my computer crunching backtesting numbers and had little else to do.

JB

I knew ART was a crank all along (easy to spot) but you provided the formal Proof. lol

 

[Cutten]

Quote from ARogueTrader:

Of course the presupposition is the such a field exists. Columbus pre-supposed the world was not flat before his journey.

That is why they call seekers of God who are following a path to be on a spiritual journey.

I accept that faith is the tool by which I will come to know God.

The last part of your comments are not clear at all to me.

Faith is not required to be applied to know this world in general in my opinion, as that which is within the scope of the physical senses and relativistic logic is their field of expertise.

Again I will repeat my question - why do you accept faith as the tool by which you will come to know God? Why rely on faith when it has such a poor record in discovering truth? And why should faith apply to belief in God, but not belief in anything else?

If someone said they "accept that faith is the tool by which I will come to know Santa Claus", would you view them as a rational or irrational person? If the latter, how is that any different to your position?

 

[dbphoenix]

Quote from Cutten:


If someone said they "accept that faith is the tool by which I will come to know Santa Claus", would you view them as a rational or irrational person?

And we are provided with tangible evidence of his existence every year . . .