timeout between posts

"Right on!"
Yeah -- I have found it a mite annoying in a hurry, but JEEEZ let's not be StockTwits.
(No offense, SOES, but if you're sipping a whiskey when you're posting? You might consider taking a bigger sip, and ... just.... slow-inggggg... down-nnn-nnnn a bit.)


If i move to an other thread after posting, and reply to something, should I have to wait a full minute to get the post to take? who else does this

look its busted. can't help it if you dont get it
 
welcome to my block list ( i had to wait 90 seconds to get this to post) cudda traded my AMD short 5 times in that period .

if the idea is anti spam, 2 minutes is unnecessary , 60 sec more than enough
who cares? And as I recall you said this before... So you don't even do what you say... :D
But keep it coming! We're all always having a laugh at your expense!;)
 
Maybe it forces people to think about what they post and also it might make them post a slightly longer version instead of running up single sentences per post... like my sister does when she texts me... all those beeps drive me nuts.
 
I almost got distracted by these idiots and missed the good AMD cover.

fortunately, I didn't miss it

Soes.... if one goes by your timestamps here... and giving you a minute or two prior to the post.... you called that AMD short at $12 and you covered just north of $13. Thats not how its supposed to work right?
There was no opportunity for a "good cover" in you timeline.
 
Since this is a useless thread anyway....

If I traded YM... I'd go long as hell right now.
(Gentleman) Trump will stick to the teleprompter and say all the right things as directed by his band of billionaires.
Dow 30K tomorrow. :D
 
Since this is a useless thread anyway....

If I traded YM... I'd go long as hell right now.
(Gentleman) Trump will stick to the teleprompter and say all the right things as directed by his band of billionaires.
Dow 30K tomorrow. :D
Up 42 since last post. :D
 
Back
Top