Time to bust the filibuster

https://www.axios.com/biden-filibuster-agenda-history-05be3812-6ee0-414b-ae71-b6dfa37d8df4.html
Biden's New Deal: Re-engineering America, quickly
President Biden recently held an undisclosed East Room session with historians that included discussion of how big is too big — and how fast is too fast — to jam through once-in-a-lifetime historic changes to America.

Why it matters ... The historians’ views were very much in sync with his own: It is time to go even bigger and faster than anyone expected. If that means chucking the filibuster and bipartisanship, so be it.

Four things are pushing Biden to jam through what could amount to a $5 trillion-plus overhaul of America, and vast changes to voting, immigration and inequality.

  1. He has full party control of Congress, and a short window to go big.
  2. He has party activists egging him on.
  3. He has strong gathering economic winds at his back.
  4. And he’s popular in polls.
Presidential historian Michael Beschloss told Axios FDR and LBJ may turn out to be the past century's closest analogues for the Biden era, "in terms of transforming the country in important ways in a short time."

  • Beschloss said the parallels include the New Deal economic relief that Franklin Roosevelt brought in 1933, which saved the country from the Depression and chaos.
  • And Biden is on track to leave the country in a different place, as Lyndon Johnson did with his Great Society programs.
People close to Biden tell us he’s feeling bullish on what he can accomplish, and is fully prepared to support the dashing of the Senate’s filibuster rule to allow Democrats to pass voting rights and other trophy legislation for his party.

  • He loves the growing narrative that he’s bolder and bigger-thinking than President Obama.
  • This temptation to go even bigger, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell insists, will create such a fissure between the parties that he compared it this week to "nuclear winter."
But we're told Biden won’t hesitate. Just as he passed the $1.9 trillion COVID rescue package with zero Republican votes and zero regrets, his team sees little chance he's going to be able to rewire the government in his image if he plays by the rules of bringing in at least 10 Republicans.

  • He won't rub their noses in it, we're told. That'll be the Biden touch to rolling the opposition — and getting that much closer to the status of latter-day FDR.
  • Biden's list includes: rural broadband expansion, which would be transformative for those communities ... make child tax credit permanent ... landmark legislation on climate, guns, voting.


How does he solve the Manchin and Sinema problem?
 
How does he solve the Manchin and Sinema problem?
back door deal w/Manchin to scuttle 15/hr (he owns a few biz that would benefit) in support for reforming the filibuster, as he's already said in an interview. Sinema should be easy enough to bully.
 
back door deal w/Manchin to scuttle 15/hr (he owns a few biz that would benefit) in support for reforming the filibuster, as he's already said in an interview. Sinema should be easy enough to bully.

Doubt it would work.He can scuttle 15 an hr without any deal.
 
Doubt it would work.He can scuttle 15 an hr without any deal.
But he wouldn't have had Biden's homeboys from Delaware voting with him to ease negative public opinion. Biden did not play hardball at all with Manchin either short of flexing with Harris on some interviews in WV.
 
But he wouldn't have had Biden's homeboys from Delaware voting with him to ease negative public opinion. Biden did not play hardball at all with Manchin either short of flexing with Harris on some interviews in WV.


This is a guy that could probably switch to the Republican party and have a better chance at winning re election.Short of some kinky sex secrets or other reputation ruining secrets I don't see him bullied.


The best chance imo is D.C. Statehood,which Manchin said he is open to.But the problem with that is they would also have to add to The SC as the current SC would probably rule it unconstitutional.PR is a good option but the party doesn't seem to be pushing that.
 
This is a guy that could probably switch to the Republican party and have a better chance at winning re election.Short of some kinky sex secrets or other reputation ruining secrets I don't see him bullied.


The best chance imo is D.C. Statehood,which Manchin said he is open to.But the problem with that is they would also have to add to The SC as the current SC would probably rule it unconstitutional.PR is a good option but the party doesn't seem to be pushing that.
never say never, a talking filibuster's as good as no filibuster

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/19/us/politics/talking-filibuster-questions-answers.html
 
While the leadership of the Republican Party is stunningly stupid, they are not so stupid as to recommend giving up the filibuster while they are the minority.

Besides, during critical national need, both parties tend to come together on legislation, even if the previous minority party would hold the economy hostage before finally coming around.
 
The filibuster, in its McConnell form, must go. In other words, it surely must violate the Constitution for any individual, even one empowered by the majority, to stop the working of the Senate, as ordered in the Constitution, completely and indefinitely. Though the Constitution makes the Senate responsible for its own rules, it would be illogical for it to have been intended that the Senate could make a rule allowing it to do away with its Constitutionally ordered functioning.

amusing that you guys are so against it only now that you have control of everything. when it was a tool to counter the GOP, though, then it is all good.
 
While the leadership of the Republican Party is stunningly stupid, they are not so stupid as to recommend giving up the filibuster while they are the minority.


They don't need to.They can always pass their top 3 priorities without giving up the filibuster-tax cuts,confirming judges and increased military spending while stopping democrat legislation.They have been owning democrats for decades with this con.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top