Yeah but he went total whack job on his Special Theory, where he said the speed of light is constant in any frame of reference. That implies that the universe cannot expand at different rates in different places, because no energy can expand faster than any other energy at any other point beyond creation. Which is why he threw up his hands at the idea at quantum entanglement. He couldn't make it work. Spooky action at a distance? Man, what a trip. No wonder his hair was the way it was.
In on the... how did Sprout know I was just rereading Einstein's the meaning of relativity? And how did he know that true clarity is obscure? Awesome. http://github.com/crowlogic/arb4jNewtonian mechanic got human to the moon. Einstein's theory explain Mercury's orbit and GPS location. The standard model settle the mass problem with higgs particle. Next will be the gravity particle. All theories have gaps and it takes some smart guys to fill the gaps.
There are alternatives to mass generation that have nothing to do with the higgs and I have good reason to suspect it's more correct.Newtonian mechanic got human to the moon. Einstein's theory explain Mercury's orbit and GPS location. The standard model settle the mass problem with higgs particle. Next will be the gravity particle. All theories have gaps and it takes some smart guys to fill the gaps.
Peter, Im not sure, check what I wrote here, https://github.com/crowlogic/arb4j/wiki/JohnMike there is no doubt this guy has the right explanation. Convential physicists say negative mass cannot exist even though in fact the Casimir effect is the prime example and involves the zeta function, which is a hint of something much deeper.Newtonian mechanic got human to the moon. Einstein's theory explain Mercury's orbit and GPS location. The standard model settle the mass problem with higgs particle. Next will be the gravity particle. All theories have gaps and it takes some smart guys to fill the gaps.
Peter, Im not sure, check what I wrote here, https://github.com/crowlogic/arb4j/wiki/JohnMike there is no doubt this guy has the right explanation. Convential physicists say negative mass cannot exist even though in fact the Casimir effect is the prime example and involves the zeta function, which is a hint of something much deeper.
John Mike could in fact be a pseudonym for an individual or perhaps group of people, the same way Nicolas Bourbaki was a madeup name by a group of mathematicians
It's The Tao. Nonconceptual pre spacetime, the nature of emptinessJust like any model, it's valid in a certain boundary condition e.g. big bang doesn't work on time zero. Einstein's time vs speed vs dimension vs mass. What will be the mass of object if it's universally stationary?