Time of active trading before becoming profitable

I think it's like anything else you want to be good at, it takes years of practice. Golf, playing an instrument, becoming a doctor, anything.
 
Quote from pismo10:

I think it's like anything else you want to be good at, it takes years of practice. Golf, playing an instrument, becoming a doctor, anything.

Agreed.

Only in trading, staying alive and always in the hunt is much tougher in my opinion.


Good Luck!
 
Finally a very good thread on ET.

Keep em coming boys.

Personal experience and opinion:


It takes about 2 years to learn the dynamics and that includes TA, some elements of FA (talking about traders and not investors).

Then it takes about 2 years more to wander around testing system and system, with your own money or on paper, fully focusing on the market.

Then, some of those systems seem to be much more comfortable to you than others, and then you start realizing that it's actually you... your own STYLE that counts and now you start focusing on the ones that really suit you.

You start thinking more about money management and trade management techniques rather than the actual setups and slowly, through the course of a trading year, you start doing things more or less intuitive, sticking with the simplest setups that don't give you any headache.

After about 4-5 years, you automatically become profitable as your mind is relaxed and you do the right things when in the trades, fully accepting the outcomes.

From here, it's all about keeping your line, researching emerging markets, types of instruments, other types of businesses that you can throw money at, etc
 
Quote from Diamond Geezer:

....and in the nth year? Exit the business and back to a regular job

I'm only stating the path of the typical person entering the business.

Everyone thinks that they are of above average or will be when they start.

Only in hollywood scripts should you never be a quitter. Be a realist and give it 100% for some period of time.

I've seen seasoned and previously successfully traders forced out after years of success due to an inability to adapt to changing regs, market conditions and technology.

Agreed. Just putting in the years and time is no guarantee the trader will EVER be profitable. Just reading this post and calculating "Gee, it will take me a few months to a few years to become profitable" is foolhardy


Some just do not have the patience, edge, understanding, discipline, etc. Others get sidetracked by a thousand different sales pitches, systems, vendors, books, websites, fax services, elliott wave/gann/astrology and other distractions
 
I'm sorry, but all this nonsense about "just be profitable regularly-look at the daily outcome and not your overall process" is why most traders blow up suddenly. You could make daily amounts shorting volatility for years, and then lose it all in a matter of seconds, since it's a negative sum game. All your doing is buying into a short term confirmation bias.

You haven't proven anything untill you've traded long enough to survive rare, major event risks. Do you guys read at all? LTCM-when genius failed?
 
Quote from wutangfinancial:

I'm sorry, but all this nonsense about "just be profitable regularly-look at the daily outcome and not your overall process" is why most traders blow up suddenly. You could make daily amounts shorting volatility for years, and then lose it all in a matter of seconds, since it's a negative sum game. All your doing is buying into a short term confirmation bias.

You haven't proven anything untill you've traded long enough to survive rare, major event risks. Do you guys read at all? LTCM-when genius failed?


Hey young buck, have you ever heard of risk management?

You think consistently profitable traders all of sudden decide to keep averaging down/up to blow up?

I kindly suggest that you work on raising your GPA and graduate first before thread-crapping here, trying to sound like you know what you are talking about.

Capiche?
 
^
1. I don't smoke weed.
2. Some aspects of financial economics are not experiential. Doesn't matter who I am. If I present some a priori mathematical principle, what does my screen name, my experience, or your experience have to do with anything? Nothing.
3. I don't have the GPA to get into Goldman Sachs as an institutional S&T out of undergrad. I've still taken more econ/higher level math courses than the average piker at a top university.
4. I never claimed to know much about day to day trading. The fact that I can spot an obvious falsehood w/little experience just shows how shoddy some of the advice here is.
 
Quote from silvermotion:

it took me 2 years of full time trading to go to noob to breakeven point. i blew up come serious money during that time

it then took another year to go to breakeven to consistently profitable. at that point it was discipline issues that prevented me from being profitable.

With that path behind me now, i can honestly say that the goal for all newbie traders should be to generate steady income. (my initial goal of course was millions in 2 minutes) Even if you generate a average of a dollar a day, everyday, thats put you ahead of a large majority of traders. Then when you're able to do this you have all the time in the world to do modeling, stats, etc to improve the result and transform a dollar a day into 100 dollars a day to thousands of dollars per day.

ditto ... but that being said I have been swing trading for 20 years but mostly part time.
 
I have been trading currencies for three years now and I do see myself turning the corner. I have tried many different setups but the key to my progress is using a strategy I am comfortable with and being disciplined enough to stick with it.

I am a former Swifttrader. They didn't teach me anything but I am glad I stuck with it because once you master your trading style the sky is the limit. The market will always give you an oppurtunity if you are patient and wait for it.



:D
 
Back
Top