"Time is Like a River" --- Franklin Graham (Billy Graham's son)

BILLY GRAHAM'S SON IS TELLING THE SAD TRUTH. NEVER SAID BETTER……

TIME IS LIKE A RIVER
Time is like a river. You cannot touch the water twice, because the
flow that has passed will never pass again. Franklin Graham was speaking at the First Baptist Church in Jacksonville , Florida , when he said America will not come back. He wrote:
“The American dream ended on November 6th, 2012. The second term of
Barack Obama has been the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed the greatest republic in the history of mankind.
A coalition of blacks, Latinos, feminists, gays, government workers,
union members, environmental extremists, the media, Hollywood , uninformed young people, the “forever needy,” the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other “fellow travelers” have ended Norman Rockwell’s America .
You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual
acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take zealots, not moderates and shy, not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status.
People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will
probably never again be able to legally comment on or concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired.
The Cocker spaniel is off the front porch, the pit bull is in the back
yard, the American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and the likes of Chicago shyster David Axelrod along with international socialist George Soros have been pulling the strings on their beige puppet and have brought us Act 2 of the New World Order.
The curtain will come down but the damage has been done, the story has
been told.
Those who come after us will once again have to risk their lives,
their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to white guilt and political correctness..”
-------------------------------------------------
Got the guts to pass it on? You bet…….I do and just did.
What a Country! Our history is littered with ridiculous overstatements and absurdities, like the above, utter garbage, attributed, possibly incorrectly, to Franklin Graham.

Here's another fine example of ridiculous overstatement and reactionary, trash spewing by James Tabor, said in the debate over Social Security in the 1930s:

...never in the history of the world has any measure been brought here so insidiously designed as to prevent business recovery, to enslave workers, and to prevent any possibility of employers providing work for people." -- James Tabor, U.S. House, Republican Representative from NY.​

Nowadays, of course, Social Security is widely recognized as the single most important contributor to lower poverty rates among the elderly, at the same time having none of the dire consequences ascribed to it by Tabor.
 
I think he laments that white christian immigrants are no longer treated as Gods but now as normal human beings who have to share the earth with not only the people they killed and enslaved to settle the land but all those who came right after them in the same manner.
 
This is my favorite part haha:

The second term ofBarack Obama has been the final nail in the coffin for the legacy ofthe white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settledand developed the greatest republic in the history of mankind.

Discovered - land was already there and inhabited. The motiviation was all about $$$$
Explored - ok
Pioneered - moved off indigineous people and farmed and fished with assistance from the Natives
Settled - occupied
Developed - for the most part but most of those white Chrsitians never farmed or worked the land for the money crops or thought that anyone but White Christian Males were entitled to prosperity.

As though White Christian were responsible for gunpowder, navigation and writing haha
 
Secular Humanism is a religion.
It is not. It lacks an essential component of all religions, i.e., a belief in, or the reliance on, the transcendent. If you define religion so broadly as to include secular humanism, then the definition becomes useless.

No doubt you will claim, as others have, that Courts have ruled that Secular Humanism is a religion. If so, it is certainly not in Davis v. Beason. My guess is that such a ruling does not exist, and the closest you will come to it is in a court finding similarities between secular humanism and religion. Why not quote a court case where it has been decided that secular humanism is a religion. We know you want to.
 
It is not. It lacks an essential component of all religions, i.e., a belief in, or the reliance on, the transcendent. If you define religion so broadly as to include secular humanism, then the definition becomes useless.

No doubt you will claim, as others have, that Courts have ruled that Secular Humanism is a religion. If so, it is certainly not in Davis v. Beason. My guess is that such a ruling does not exist, and the closest you will come to it is in a court finding similarities between secular humanism and religion. Why not quote a court case where it has been decided that secular humanism is a religion. We know you want to.
Let me know if you find it, I would love the tax exempt status.
 
It is not. It lacks an essential component of all religions, i.e., a belief in, or the reliance on, the transcendent. If you define religion so broadly as to include secular humanism, then the definition becomes useless. No doubt you will claim, as others have, that Courts have ruled that Secular Humanism is a religion. If so, it is certainly not in Davis v. Beason. My guess is that such a ruling does not exist, and the closest one will come to it is in a court finding similarities between secular humanism and religion. Why not quote a court case where it has been decided that secular humanism is a religion. We know you want to.

You can argue whether secular humanism or atheism are religions but clearly they are religious views even if not organized religions.

If it helps if I say that the progressives and lefty governments are supporting a particular religious view rather than a religion then that is fine.

You cite Davis v. Beason to make your point? Please, we know that your kneejerk response to everthing is to google up something. Might want to try again, or even cite Canadian law as you often do.
 
Back
Top