Timmay Sykes(aka timvodas) says "Goodbye ET"...
Bye..Bye..Timmay.......
(We do not deserve or want your "great" advice!!)
Tim Sykes Hedge Fund
- Thread starter timvodas
- Start date
Timmay Sykes(aka timvodas) says "Goodbye ET"...
Bye..Bye..Timmay.......
(We do not deserve or want your "great" advice!!)
This site sucks now, Timmay and Turder have completely taken over.
its pretty obvious, but I don't know why it escaped me earlier:
Bob Rowshan = quantsteve = Restricted = EPrado
Its a small world afterall !!!
Bob Rowshan = quantsteve = Restricted = EPrado
Its a small world afterall !!!
Well it's credible in your eyes because it's positive, who cares about the fact that the author obviously does not know a d*mn thing about the industry. Kinda like you.
You're entertaining, I will give you that, but you're also borderline delirious. The haters do give you more crap than you deserve, but their argument is based on facts while yours is based on a weak reply of "you/they/anyone who doesn't love just does not know the real story" and "read my book". Yet if someone reads your book, does not like it and continues to raise the same criticisms, you reply again with "you do not know the facts".
By the way, you only have yourself to blame for the amount of "haters". Maybe, just maybe some day you will be able to take an objective look at how you presented yourself on ET (let alone TV) and then realize why you get such hate.
1. I welcome the haters, it's going to be fun to prove them all wrong! Anyway, this isn't about me, there is a greater issue at stake here (industry transparency needed) so if my ego gets bruised in the process, so be it.
2. I have no problem with negative reviews, just the factually inaccurate ones.
3. This review is credible because he works for one of the most respected publications in the world and he presented all the facts, both good and bad.
You do not know anything about the industry, nor much about trading. The hedge fund industry is a very vast one, but you're on the side of the Bullsh*t Wanna-Be Hedge Funds, and noone really cares about those.
What's innaccurate about your audited results or the fact that your book is really not that interesting or the fact that your story is a dime a dozen?
Most of your positive reviews are factually innaccurate also.
Regardless, why bother deleting anything and just let the people do what they want to do. You have nuthuggers as well, pathetic losers who kiss your ass in the hopes that maybe they can share in your snake-oil. You let them post their BS reviews, so let everyone else do the same. Or you have problems facing the truth?
Dow Jones Newswire is known for being a NEWSWIRE, not an original publication. Whoever that guy is, I do not know but he is not knowledgeable or bright. In fact, he is generally trying to stay neutral but leaves on a positive note as a professional. Who really cares, he is a low level writer, otherwise he would writing for a primary publication, not a newswire
The truly honest reviews you avoid. The fact is that your book is B-tier at the most. The fact is that you know very little about the industry you claim to expose.
You have the same old 3 or 4 responses that you keep repeating, you lean on your nuthuggers and the idiots who keep emailing you and you are in denial. You do not know much about Wall Street or how the game works, you were never a part of it and never will be. And I am not critisizing you for that fact, it's the fact that you try to claim like you know anything.
As for your investors, they got what they deserve. Only someone of subpar intelligence would invest money in your fund, even prior to your inevitable drawdown & finale.