You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
TickZoom questions
- Thread starter Batman28
- Start date
My guess is, the thread was removed for one of the following reasons:
1) TickZoom has become vaporware - I can't see the source code on the site and the announced release date has passed (the date was moved several times)
2) Licensing has some commercial aspect to it, therefore, it is against ET policy to post about it here.
3) People had enough with all of the TickZoom hype and spamming that was going on and complained to the ET moderators.
Of course, I'm only guessing. I had a thread deleted the other day without explanation but I guess it was because I linked (innocently) to a commercial product.
BMe.
1) TickZoom has become vaporware - I can't see the source code on the site and the announced release date has passed (the date was moved several times)
2) Licensing has some commercial aspect to it, therefore, it is against ET policy to post about it here.
3) People had enough with all of the TickZoom hype and spamming that was going on and complained to the ET moderators.
Of course, I'm only guessing. I had a thread deleted the other day without explanation but I guess it was because I linked (innocently) to a commercial product.
BMe.
Interesting, I just found the thread here in Automated Trading.
It has it's own data storage method which is far better than any "database" for 2 reasons.
1. Tick data is very small number of bytes. When stored as a "row" or "object" it incurs overhead in the database that is larger than the tick and drastically increasing the space required for the data which is already quite large anyway.
2. TickZOOM reads it's data direction from the file into memory as binary. So it's extremely fast. It can load millions of rows (ticks) of data in mere seconds. Every database solution tried can take drastically longer. Object databases are the fastest at between 10 to 30 minutes. Relational DBs can take hours or days.
Sincerely,
Wayne
EDIT: The TickReader and TickWriter have source code so if someone wants to try other storage methods, be my quest. We're planning, at some point, to either use TREE or something like it for more complete solution to tick storage.
It has it's own data storage method which is far better than any "database" for 2 reasons.
1. Tick data is very small number of bytes. When stored as a "row" or "object" it incurs overhead in the database that is larger than the tick and drastically increasing the space required for the data which is already quite large anyway.
2. TickZOOM reads it's data direction from the file into memory as binary. So it's extremely fast. It can load millions of rows (ticks) of data in mere seconds. Every database solution tried can take drastically longer. Object databases are the fastest at between 10 to 30 minutes. Relational DBs can take hours or days.
Sincerely,
Wayne
EDIT: The TickReader and TickWriter have source code so if someone wants to try other storage methods, be my quest. We're planning, at some point, to either use TREE or something like it for more complete solution to tick storage.
Mostly correct. Some clarification.
TickZOOM (once released) will continue to be free for the foreseeable future so we have permission to discuss it.
You guessed quite well.
Well, since the original date of end of December, it has moved several times until 25th of this month. That date seems firm. We'll see.Quote from byteme:
My guess is, the thread was removed for one of the following reasons:
1) TickZoom has become vaporware - I can't see the source code on the site and the announced release date has passed (the date was moved several times)
Incorrect. This was discussed. Including with the administration of ET.2) Licensing has some commercial aspect to it, therefore, it is against ET policy to post about it here.
TickZOOM (once released) will continue to be free for the foreseeable future so we have permission to discuss it.
Partially true. People enjoyed the technical discussion but complained about all the licensing discussion which got off topic for the original threads. That makes sense. And I apologize to anyone for going off topic in the past. We'll try to keep this thread on the OP's topic of database for TickZOOM.3) People had enough with all of the TickZoom hype and spamming that was going on and complained to the ET moderators.
Of course, I'm only guessing. I had a thread deleted the other day without explanation but I guess it was because I linked (innocently) to a commercial product.
You guessed quite well.