one thing it may do is stop the gyrations in the 5 yr cash which you can see when someone misses on one side of a Basis trade, but I agree it overall sucks!
Quote from EllisWyatt:
The reduced tick size disincents liquidity providers, and benefits liquidity takers.
As a result, I expect the liquidity of the Bond and 5 Year products to decrease, all else being equal.
I expect annual trade volume to decrease, which decreases fee generation for the exchange.
Thankfully CME has not included the 10 Year in this...wonder why?
Quote from BondTrader50:
They say "Sorry Sir, but we now serve half burgers for the same price as the former full ones, come again soon!"
Quote from polpolik:
Correct me if i'm wrong but why would that increase cost to traders? the multiplier/leverage is the same right? The only that it'll allow is for people to get in and out easier thus increasing their revenue that way.
But if I'm just trading x contracts now, by reducing tick size, it won't make me pay more since the multiplier is still the same.
Am I missing something?
Quote from polpolik:
Correct me if i'm wrong but why would that increase cost to traders? the multiplier/leverage is the same right? The only that it'll allow is for people to get in and out easier thus increasing their revenue that way.
But if I'm just trading x contracts now, by reducing tick size, it won't make me pay more since the multiplier is still the same.
Am I missing something?