Thug In Chief Obama: FOX News Is "Destructive"

A nice little sidebar story:

Poll: Among cable-news networks, MSNBC trusted by … 12%
POSTED AT 10:55 AM ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 BY ED MORRISSEY

In an otherwise serious poll from Politico and George Washington University, the survey also asks respondents which cable-news network they access most for political news. The results aren’t terribly surprising, as they more or less mirror the ratings, but are still noteworthy for one network’s almost-total marginalization. While Fox News Channel sailed to an impressive 42% and CNN got a substantial if unimpressive 30%, MSNBC got …
More people are getting their news about the upcoming election from cable television than any other source, and from Fox News more than any other cable channel, according to a POLITICO/George Washington University Battleground Poll released Monday.

The poll found that 81 percent of those polled get their news about the midterm elections from cable channels, like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, or their websites, compared with 71 percent from national network news channels, such as ABC, NBC or CBS, and their websites.

Among cable news channels, Fox was the clear winner, with 42 percent of respondents saying it is their main source, compared with 30 percent who cited CNN and 12 percent who rely on MSNBC.
How did it get to this state? After all, NBC had a long history in television news, starting decades before CNN and even longer than Fox. Its partnership with Microsoft should have given the cable news network a distinct advantage in the New Media world. Their roster of news anchors, present and future, should have immediately challenged CNN for primacy and marginalized Fox, who may have had cash but relatively fewer newsgathering resources in the US when it launched.

Under the direction of GE’s Jeff Immelt, though, NBC’s cable network went for the full-insane demographic. Fox took CNN’s talking-head format and simply reversed the bias, although Fox rightly argues that it presents more opposing viewpoints than CNN did as part of their establishment talent and not just occasional guests and party spinmeisters. NBC decided to emulate Air America with its cable lineup instead, perhaps seeing some opportunity in the last Bush term to capitalize on his unpopularity and become a center of opposition opinion.

Rather than accomplish that, the decision by NBC and its parent GE has not just destroyed MSNBC’s credibility but also NBC’s as well. With the exception of Joe Scarborough, who is hard to pigeonhole but certainly isn’t a hard-Left hysteric, the entire lineup is exactly what one would find on the failed libtalker radio network. It’s no coincidence that two of its featured hosts come straight out of Air America, Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz. Maddow has, at least, produced a watchable show, albeit with a hard-Left tilt that clearly is out of touch with the mainstream, but Schultz is barely coherent. Top that off with a daily “news” broadcast from Keith Olbermann that almost literally consists of a Two Minute Hate (Olbermann’s WPIW lists), and it’s a recipe for the kind of disaster that only political hacks could love. The wonder is that GE and NBC apparently seem content to alienate 88% of the viewing audience with its trainwreck theater.
 
Quote from BSAM:

Well, where to begin?

First of all, if you think FOX is center right, then we already got a disagreement going. But, let's move on...

I'll be fairly brief.

I don't watch ABC, NBC, or CBS. Who are they?? I mean, this ain't 1960.

FOX = Radical right.

MSNBC = Radical left.

CNN = Where I go if I want real news.

Too bad though. CNN is also where I would go if I wanted to hear the anti-white man news. That's why I don't go there for such. I happen to be white. I happen to not be a racist and I don't like it when I hear it. I don't like it when I hear it about black people, brown people, or white people. So, I find CNN guilty of racism.

You see, I'm a person who is not controlled by Sean Hannity, Keith Olbermann, Rush Limbaugh, or any other person for that matter. And, I call 'em like I see 'em. Oh yeah, Karl Rove sucks.

I do believe that Bill O'reilly makes an effort to look at both sides of an issue. And, this may come as a shocker to you, but Ann Coulter also makes many good points, in my opinion.

So, I watch some MSNBC, CNN, and FOX. Then, I decide who is being "fair and balanced". Don't forget, Pat Buchanan is on MSNBC.

You got to look at the big picture and not close your mind to the thoughts and actions of others, until they prove their intent. I think Hannity, Limbaugh, and Olbermann.....and, oh yeah Rachel Maddow...(excuse me just a moment; I got to go vomit.)

Okay, back now.

...have proved what they are up to.
Interesting point of view.
 
"The poll found that 81 percent of those polled get their news about the midterm elections from cable channels, like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, or their websites, compared with 71 percent from national network news channels, such as ABC, NBC or CBS, and their websites."


Hmm...Never was too good at math, so can someone tell me what 81 + 71 comes out to?

Thanks.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

i think of it this way...

if i despise a person as much as i do our president, and he despises fox news, then i gotta say that's what i'm going to watch.

that's probably behind the popularity of fox news right now.

i mean, just look here:

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/09/28/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-september-27-2010/65673

it doesn't lie......

Ooooooh! I get it. So, whichever channel has the most numbers, must be telling the most truth, right?

(Looking upward while slapping my face...) Why couldn't I figure that out??
 
Quote from BSAM:

"The poll found that 81 percent of those polled get their news about the midterm elections from cable channels, like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, or their websites, compared with 71 percent from national network news channels, such as ABC, NBC or CBS, and their websites."


Hmm...Never was too good at math, so can someone tell me what 81 + 71 comes out to?

Thanks.

You should look up the actual article. It may help to clear up your poor math skills.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

You should look up the actual article. It may help to clear up your poor math skills.

Naaaaw....Too lazy....Was just going by what you posted. Looks like some FOX news math to me. That's not what they taught when I went to school.
 
I assume that factoring into our calcuation of US media bias, the bias of the rest of the planet's media, is of no use because....

we're number 1! we're number 1! hoo ray! ooh rah! yee haw! go team! go!!?
 
Quote from BSAM:

Naaaaw....Too lazy....Was just going by what you posted. Looks like some FOX news math to me. That's not what they taught when I went to school.

"according to a POLITICO/George Washington University Battleground Poll released Monday."

FOX News? You need a whole education.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

"according to a POLITICO/George Washington University Battleground Poll released Monday."

FOX News? You need a whole education.

Your bullshit is weak, Bugs. How much is 81 + 71?
 
Back
Top