Throwing water on the argument that the US is a violent place to live

It always humored me to hear from folks outside of this country (like Nine Ender for example) how violent the US is, how many guns we have, the murder rate, etc. Never mind that they are shown statistics of just who commits most of those crimes or where those crimes take place, etc. Add this thread to more "snowflake melting" statistics that, when layered with geographical data, will no doubt be called "rayciss" in the end.

-------------------------------

51% Of Murders In The U.S. Come From Just 2% Of The Counties


Authored by John R. Lott, Jr. via Crime Prevention Research Center




The Distribution of Murders

The United States can really be divided up into three types of places. Places where there are no murders, places where there are a few murders, and places where murders are very common.


In 2014, the most recent year that a county level breakdown is available, 54% of counties (with 11% of the population) have no murders. 69% of counties have no more than one murder, and about 20% of the population. These counties account for only 4% of all murders in the country.

The worst 1% of counties have 19% of the population and 37% of the murders. The worst 5% of counties contain 47% of the population and account for 68% of murders. As shown in figure 2, over half of murders occurred in only 2% of counties.

Murders actually used to be even more concentrated. From 1977 to 2000, on average 73 percent of counties in any give year had zero murders. Possibly, this change is a result of the opioid epidemic’s spread to more rural areas. But that question is beyond the scope of this study. Lott’s book “More Guns, Less Crime” showed how dramatically counties within states vary dramatically with respect to murder and other violent crime rates.






Breaking down the most dangerous counties in Figure 2 shows over half the murders occur in just 2% of the counties, 37% in just the worst 1% of the counties.





Figure 1 illustrates how few counties have a significant number of murders. Figure 3 further illustrates that with a cumulative perspective. 54% of counties have zero murders, 69% have at most one murder, 76% have at most two murders, and so on. To put it differently, only the top four percent of the counties have 16 or more murders.

If the 1% of the counties with the worst number of murders somehow were to become a separate country, the murder rate in the rest of the US would have been only 3.4 in 2014. Removing the worst 2% or 5% would have reduced the US rate to just 3.06 or 2.56 per 100,000, respectively.





Even within the Counties with the murders, the murders are heavily Concentrated within those counties

When you look at individual counties with a high number of murders, you find large areas with few murders. Take Los Angeles County, with 526 murders in 2014, the most of any county in the US. The county has virtually no murders in the northwestern part of the county. There was only one murder each in Beverly Hills, Hawthorne, and Van Nuys. Clearly, different parts of the county face very different risks of murder.





The map below shows the distribution of murders in Indianapolis, with 135 murders. Although the city extends well beyond the 465 Highway that encircles downtown Indianapolis, there are only four murders outside of that loop. The northern half of the city within 465 also has relatively few murders.





Washington, DC has large areas without murders. 14th Street NW divides the eastern and western parts of the district, with murders overwhelmingly limited to the eastern half. The area around the capitol is also extremely safe.





Here is the murder map for Dallas.





Gun Ownership

According to a 2013 PEW Research Center survey, the household gun ownership rate in rural areas was 2.11 times greater than in urban areas (“Why Own a Gun? Protection is Now Top Reason,” PEW Research Center, March 12, 2013). Suburban households are 28.6% more likely to own guns than urban households. Despite lower gun ownership, urban areas experience much higher murder rates. One should not put much weight on this purely “cross-sectional” evidence over one point in time, but it is still interesting to note that so much of the country has both very high gun ownership rates and zero murders.

Conclusion

This study shows how murders in the United States are heavily concentrated in very small areas. Few appreciate how much of the US has no murders each year. Murder isn’t a nationwide problem. It’s a problem in a very small set of urban areas, and any solution must reduce those murders.
 
Washington, DC has large areas without murders. 14th Street NW divides the eastern and western parts of the district, with murders overwhelmingly limited to the eastern half. The area around the capitol is also extremely safe.

I want to correct this. 14th Street NW does not divide the eastern and western part of DC. The city is laid out on a grid centered on the Capitol. That is the actual dividing line between the four quadrants, ie NW, NE, SW, SE. The only truly safe part is NW and parts of that are dodgy.

14th Street NW was burned down in the '68 riots and up until the last 10 years or so marked the eastern edge of "safe" downtown. The areas to the east of it have now been rebuilt and include the Verizon Center sports complex and the Penn Square office area. I would call most of it mixed, in the sense that it is relatively safe in the daytime but I would never go strolling there at night.

The Capitol Hill area is definitely not safe. The few blocks immediately surrounding the Capitol are safe because they are saturated with Capitol police and many of the streets are now blocked off. A few blocks north, south or east however will put you in very dangerous areas.

I don't want to nitpick the OP article because it is very good. However I know a lot of people visit Washington and often lack an appreciation of what they may be getting into.
 
I want to correct this. 14th Street NW does not divide the eastern and western part of DC. The city is laid out on a grid centered on the Capitol. That is the actual dividing line between the four quadrants, ie NW, NE, SW, SE. The only truly safe part is NW and parts of that are dodgy.

14th Street NW was burned down in the '68 riots and up until the last 10 years or so marked the eastern edge of "safe" downtown. The areas to the east of it have now been rebuilt and include the Verizon Center sports complex and the Penn Square office area. I would call most of it mixed, in the sense that it is relatively safe in the daytime but I would never go strolling there at night.

The Capitol Hill area is definitely not safe. The few blocks immediately surrounding the Capitol are safe because they are saturated with Capitol police and many of the streets are now blocked off. A few blocks north, south or east however will put you in very dangerous areas.

I don't want to nitpick the OP article because it is very good. However I know a lot of people visit Washington and often lack an appreciation of what they may be getting into.

Good to know, thanks, AAA. I sooner drink kerosene and piss on a campfire than visit D.C., though.
 
Weren't you paying attention? Saying that is rayciss.
It's the exact same thing in our failing schools. And it's very easily identified by race. And nobody is saying it has anything to do with genetics or even culture. Blacks in predominately white schools test very high and the whole USA predominately white suburb schools score higher than most other countries. But the inner city predominately black/hispanic brings the average down so low it looks like USA is not doing a good job of educating. You could ask the question the other way. Why do so many blacks and hispanics live in neighborhoods with high murder rates and failing schools?
 
Back
Top