three fucking mins?

Ok...maybe so. I appreciate the response

.
Quote from Baron:

Because you probably clicked on "quote" instead of "edit", and that caused you to submit a completely new post. Again, it's yet another mistake on your part. Tighten up! :D
More...
 
Is the point of this thread just to show the stupidity of the thread starter? Both in his inability to refrain from using profanity and by lashing out at ET for obvious mistakes he made himself?

If so, mission accomplished.
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Ok...then why on occasion do edited posts (within only several short minutes of posting the original) show up as an entirely new post?

BTW: fuck

:D
More...

I know its the New Year but ease up on the Vodka!!!!!:D ...Zhivodka.....
 
I read not too long ago that editing for less than 3 minutes was too short. Editing for 3-13 minutes was the best. Editing for more than 13 minutes was too damn long. So I guess editing for 30 minutes is way too damn long.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top