Quote from Free Thinker:
under an income tax warren would owe nothing. sounds fair and logical. if you have a bad year and have no income. no tax.
under a consumption tax scheme if you have a bad year and have no income you still pay tax.
its also not logical. why would he decide to not make money? since most of his money just rolls in without his direct participation he would have to go to extreme lengths to stop making money.Quote from OccupyThis:
I understand this. But your point above was that no one can make him spend money so it's still not fair.
Quote from Free Thinker:
...are you that dense? say consumption taxes for eating and taking a shit are 1000 a year. if warren decides he wants to live frugally and spend nothing extra that year and his total tax bill is $1000 what precentage of his income is it?
now look at granny. she earns 12000 a year through ss. she has to eat and take a shit too and spends the same $1000. what precentage of her income is that?