Thousands gather for climate change rally in D.C.

[Max E.]

Quote from futurecurrents:

Thousands gather for climate change rally in D.C.

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

Classic!

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from gwb-trading:

I do not believe that man has any significant influence on global warming, global cooling, or large-scale climate change. In particular I do not believe that man-made CO2 released in the atmosphere is causing 'global warming' or 'climate change'. The earth's temperature goes in natural cycles... just as it has for thousands of years - even before man showed up. The temperature in each hemisphere is also dependent on short-term and long-term changes in the axial tilt of the earth.

The scientific proof for 'global warming' is weak at best and most of the data sets used by global warming promoters are completely fraudulent (due to them deliberately filtering out adverse data or adding fake data as in the East Anglia dataset).

'Global Warming' or 'Climate Change' is more of a political movement and money-making scam than any type of scientific reality.

So you think all this data is wrong?

 

[377OHMS]

Quote from gwb-trading:

I do not believe that man has any significant influence on global warming, global cooling, or large-scale climate change. In particular I do not believe that man-made CO2 released in the atmosphere is causing 'global warming' or 'climate change'. The earth's temperature goes in natural cycles... just as it has for thousands of years - even before man showed up. The temperature in each hemisphere is also dependent on short-term and long-term changes in the axial tilt of the earth.

The scientific proof for 'global warming' is weak at best and most of the data sets used by global warming promoters are completely fraudulent (due to them deliberately filtering out adverse data or adding fake data as in the East Anglia dataset).

'Global Warming' or 'Climate Change' is more of a political movement and money-making scam than any type of scientific reality.

Excellent. Wish I could write so concisely.

The Earths axis of rotation "nutates" or if you prefer, "precesses" causing variation in the how long the Sun-Earth vector impinges on the Northern Hemisphere (recall that the axis of rotation is inclined 23.5 degrees from the plane of the ecliptic). This variation is sufficient to disrupt the "Atlantic Conveyer" current which cycles warm water into the the north-most regions of the seas and displaces colder water towards the south.

At points of time where the polar axis has precessed until it has its equatorial component pointing outward (away from the sun) the north has very long cold winters and some encroachment of ice towards the south, sometimes all the way into Europe. When at this time there is a simultaneous Solar Minimum the Earth has experienced an ice age which persists until either the solar flux increases or the equatorial component of the axis of rotation precesses around towards the sun.

There was a time when I was at odds with you regarding the Treyvon Martin case and I said some things I now regret. You are clearly a thoughtful man and I see now that you are a truth-seeker. My apology is offered for my behavior during some of our previous interactions. I need to remind myself, daily, that it is important to not judge people hastily simply because they disagree with me. Salute.

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from futurecurrents:

So you think all this data is wrong?

I think all the fabricated data is wrong. When global warming promoters take datasets and filter out any of the stations and/or readings that do not support their perspective, and also add fake data points to create false impressions -- then there is a significant issue with the "science". At this point all the datasets typically used by global warming alarmists can not even pass a basic fraud detection algorithm.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from gwb-trading:

I think all the fabricated data is wrong. When global warming promoters take datasets and filter out any of the stations and/or readings that do not support their perspective, and also add fake data points to create false impressions -- then there is a significant issue with the "science". At this point all the datasets typically used by global warming alarmists can not even pass a basic fraud detection algorithm.

You did not answer my question. Do you think that the multiple data sets graphically represented above are all wrong?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

It's irrelevant.

As is Ricky retard's opinion on the subject.

 

[Lucrum]

Now is this the climate change rally or Odumbo's inauguration?

 

[Ricter]

Quote from gwb-trading:

I do not believe that man has any significant influence on global warming, global cooling, or large-scale climate change. In particular I do not believe that man-made CO2 released in the atmosphere is causing 'global warming' or 'climate change'. The earth's temperature goes in natural cycles... just as it has for thousands of years - even before man showed up. The temperature in each hemisphere is also dependent on short-term and long-term changes in the axial tilt of the earth.

The scientific proof for 'global warming' is weak at best and most of the data sets used by global warming promoters are completely fraudulent (due to them deliberately filtering out adverse data or adding fake data as in the East Anglia dataset).

'Global Warming' or 'Climate Change' is more of a political movement and money-making scam than any type of scientific reality.

Sounds like you definitely do not believe in AGW. But what about GW?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

....we are not always right.